Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.19558

The Two-Level Poset Game is PSPACE-Complete

Abstract

Poset games form a fundamental class of combinatorial games that includes classical games such as Nim and Chomp. Determining the outcome of a poset game is known to be PSPACE-complete even for posets of height at most three. However, the exact computational complexity of Two-Level Poset Game, played on posets of height at most two, has remained an open problem for over a decade. We resolve this problem by proving that Two-Level Poset Game is PSPACE-complete via a polynomial-time reduction from Avoid True on positive CNF formulas.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kengo Hashimoto. 2026-10-14. The Two-Level Poset Game is PSPACE-Complete. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19558

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Conormal Lower Bounds for Determinantal Complexity: Fermat Slices, Tight Bounds, and a Ceiling

The determinantal complexity of a polynomial $f$ is the smallest size of a matrix of affine linear forms whose determinant is $f$; the border version only asks for determinants converging to $f$. The polar method bounds these quantities from below by comparing an invariant of the hypersurface $V(f)$, such as the degree of its dual variety, with the number of solutions of a polynomial system built from a determinantal representation of $f$. We determine how far the method reaches. Lower bounds: if $f$ has a linear restriction to a form of degree $d$ in $N$ variables with smooth projective zero set, then the border determinantal complexity of $f$ is at least $(N-1)(d-1)/(4e)$. Setting the off-diagonal host entries to zero turns every homomorphism polynomial $\hom_{F,q}$ with a connected pattern $F$ into a Fermat polynomial, which gives the bound $(q-1)(|E(F)|-1)/(4e)$. For the VBP-complete path family $W_q$ this is tight: the border determinantal complexity of $W_q$ is $Θ(q^3)$. The same argument gives cubic bounds for natural VP- and VNP-complete families, and a bound in terms of the codimension of the singular locus of $V(f)$. A ceiling: the method, together with every refinement in a precisely defined class, cannot prove a lower bound larger than $O(dN)$ for any polynomial of degree $d$ in $N$ variables. The proof computes the solution count exactly, as the degree of the dual of a generic determinantal hypersurface, and shows that every characteristic-cycle invariant of a hypersurface of degree $d$ is at most $8(d-1)^{N-1}+8N$. For the $n\times n$ permanent the ceiling is $O(n^3)$; for the power sum $x_1^N+\dots+x_N^N$ it is $(1+o(1))N^2/(4e)$, matching the known lower bound.

cs.CC↗

Lettericity Is NP-Complete

The lettericity of a graph $G$ is the smallest size of a set $Σ$ such that there exist $w_1, \ldots, w_{|V(G)|} \in Σ$ and a so-called decoder $D \subseteq Σ^2$ for which $G$ is isomorphic to the letter graph $(\{1, \ldots, |V(G)|\}, \{ij : 1 \le i < j \le |V(G)|, w_iw_j \in D\})$. It took around two decades of the study of lettericity for, in the simpler case of paths, a closed-form expression for its lettericity to be derived; this suggests that the question of whether the lettericity of an arbitrary graph can be computed in polynomial time is nontrivial. Indeed, this question has been raised repeatedly as an open problem in recent literature. We solve this problem by showing that the lettericity problem on arbitrary graphs is NP-complete. We also show that each of the natural ways in which a single part of a structure $(Σ, w_1, \ldots, w_{|V(G)|}, D)$ witnessing the lettericity could be constrained corresponds to an NP-complete problem, which resolves an additional three open problems from the literature; in particular, we show that the coloring extension, word extension, and decoder extension problems are NP-complete. Additionally, we use the reduction in the NP-completeness proof to give a lower bound on algorithms for lettericity under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH): unless the ETH is false, there cannot exist a deterministic algorithm to decide whether the lettericity of an $n$-vertex graph is at most $k$ in time $2^{o(n)}$, even when $n = 6k$. Finally, we complement the known result that Lettericity is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the standard parameter $k$ by providing a fixed-parameter algorithm with respect to the dual parameterization by $n-k$ running in $2^{\mathcal{O}((n-k)^2)} + \mathcal{O}(n)$ time.

cs.CC↗

Asymmetry and Complexity of Nondeterministic Computations

Symmetry of Information (SoI) [ZL70] is a fundamental theorem of classical Kolmogorov complexity whose status for time-bounded computation is closely related to central open problems in complexity theory and cryptography. In a recent development, [HMO26] showed that SoI fails for $rKt$ complexity, namely in the setting of randomized computation. By contrast, many basic properties of Kolmogorov complexity are known to remain valid in the presence of nondeterminism [HLO26], suggesting that SoI may provide a fruitful structural principle for exploring the relative power of randomness and nondeterminism in computation. Our results reveal that the validity of SoI for nondeterministic computation, namely for $nKt$ complexity, is a subtle question connected to several frontiers. We show that symmetry of information holds on average for randomized extensions of $nKt$, while its worst case validity would imply breakthrough complexity separations. Although the standard cryptographic argument for asymmetry does not extend to the nondeterministic setting, we provide evidence that information remains asymmetric in nondeterministic computations. Among other results, we show that SoI would imply a collapse of exponential time classes to low levels of the polynomial hierarchy. Then, building on the work of [Hir22b, GK22, KK26, HMO26], we develop a general framework connecting symmetry of information, meta-complexity, and explicit constructions in the nondeterministic setting. More precisely, we prove that suitable formulations of these three notions are quantitatively equivalent. We apply different aspects of this correspondence to make progress on complexity lower bounds and on the failure of SoI for nondeterministic computation. These consequences are unconditional and provide some of the strongest known lower bounds in meta-complexity.

cs.CC↗