arXiv · 2610.19611
What Breaks in Multi-Image Schema Application? Factorial Oracle Interventions Reveal an Instance-Information Bottleneck
Abstract
Modern vision-language models can accept multi-image contexts, but aggregate accuracy rarely reveals where a multi-image reasoning pipeline fails. We study a controlled schema-application task in which a model must locate two target characters in a 16-image sequence, identify their visual attributes, consult an item-specific visual codebook, and compose two ordered nonce code names. We introduce a within-item 2-by-2 factorial Oracle design: Oracle-A supplies a verified textual schema, Oracle-B supplies a verified ordered target-appearance representation, and both interventions retain the original images and final question. Across 72 new items and 1,188 analyzed model responses, Oracle-B increased strict exact accuracy by 54.6 percentage points (95% confidence interval: 46.3 to 63.0) and outperformed Oracle-A by 60.6 points (Holm-adjusted p-value no greater than .0002). An auxiliary retrieval diagnostic reached only 49.1% ordered-appearance accuracy even after removing code-name generation. Providing both Oracle sources yielded 100% accuracy across all models. These results localize the dominant recoverable deficit to upstream ordered instance recovery rather than primarily to downstream schema use and composition.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Yiliu Xu, Xinjin Li, Yu Ma. 2026-10-14. What Breaks in Multi-Image Schema Application? Factorial Oracle Interventions Reveal an Instance-Information Bottleneck. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19611
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.