arXiv · 2610.19912
Quantifying Annotation Agreement in Object Detection with Optimal Transport
Abstract
Reliable validation of machine learning models is a crucial step in designing robust and trustworthy systems. Yet validation relies on annotated test sets treated as ground truth, even though annotations can be noisy or ambiguous. In object detection, sources may disagree on object presence, box location, or class label. Standard agreement metrics usually binarize box overlap before computing a summary score, obscuring the degree and structure of disagreement between annotation sets. Here, we study an Optimal Transport (OT)-based metric for measuring agreement between object detection annotations. Instead of binarizing bounding box overlap, this metric assigns graded costs to matched and unmatched labeled boxes. Through theoretical analysis and experiments on real and synthetically perturbed annotations, we show that OT captures graded changes in agreement and distinguishes annotation pairs that thresholded metrics score identically. Our results suggest that OT provides a richer measure of annotation agreement in object detection, especially for domains with many small or ambiguous objects. Such agreement estimates can support more reliable validation when labels are noisy or conflicting.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Kirill Prokhorov, Alexandr A. Kalinin. 2026-10-14. Quantifying Annotation Agreement in Object Detection with Optimal Transport. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19912
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.