Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.19929

The Gannon Storm: Citizen science observations during the geomagnetic superstorm of 10 May 2024

Abstract

The 10 May 2024 geomagnetic storm, referred to as the Gannon Storm in this paper, was one of the most extreme to have occurred in over 20 years. In the era of smartphones and social media, millions of people from all around the world were alerted to the possibility of exceptional auroral displays. Hence, many people not only witnessed but also photographed the aurora during this event. These citizen science observations, although not from scientific instruments operated by observatories or research groups, can prove invaluable in obtaining data to characterise this extraordinary event. In particular, many observers saw and photographed the aurora at mid-latitudes, where ground-based instruments targeting auroral studies are sparse or absent. We created an online survey and circulated it within networks of aurora photographers to collect observations of the aurora and disruptions in technological systems that were experienced during this superstorm. We obtained 696 citizen science reports from over 30 countries, containing information such as the time and location of aurora sightings, observed colours and auroral forms during the geomagnetic storm. We supplemented the obtained dataset with 186 auroral observations logged in the Skywarden catalogue by citizen scientists. The main findings enabled by the data collected through these reports are that the aurora was widely seen from locations at geomagnetic latitudes ranging between 30° and 60°, with a few reports from even lower latitudes. This was significantly further equatorward than predicted by auroral oval models. The reported auroral emission colours, predominantly red and pink and intense enough to reach naked-eye visibility, suggest that the auroral electron precipitation contained large fluxes of low-energy (< 1 keV) particles. (...)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maxime Grandin, Emma Bruus, Vincent E. Ledvina, Noora Partamies, Mathieu Barthelemy, Carlos Martinis, Rowan Dayton-Oxland, Bea Gallardo-Lacourt, Yukitoshi Nishimura, Katie Herlingshaw, Neethal Thomas, Eero Karvinen, Donna Lach, Marjan Spijkers, Calle Bergstrand. 2026-10-14. The Gannon Storm: Citizen science observations during the geomagnetic superstorm of 10 May 2024. https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-297-2024

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

An Adaptive Approach for Modeling Collisionless Plasma Shocks and Ion Heating in the Shock Frame

We present a novel computational method for hybrid (kinetic ions, quasi-neutral fluid electrons) simulations of non-relativistic magnetized collisionless plasma shocks, observed near the Sun, in the solar system, and beyond. This Adaptive Frame-Of-Reference Approach (AFORA) enables simulations of shocks in their co-moving frames of reference, where shock evolution remains quasi-steady for quasi-stationary upstream conditions, in contrast to moving shocks. We demonstrate our method in two spatial dimensions for a range of angles between the background magnetic field and the shock normal (obliquities). Shock-frame simulations, conducted with a time-adaptive hybrid code, HYPERS, are shown to self-consistently capture upstream and downstream magnetic fluctuations commonly observed by spacecraft at interplanetary shocks and Earth's bow shock. These fluctuations, which may be crucial for estimating the efficiency of ion acceleration at heliospheric and astrophysical shocks, are notably missing from many hybrid simulations of shocks, unless upstream external turbulence is imposed. The quasi-stationary behavior of numerical shocks in the shock frame is confirmed in a series of animations and by demonstrating converged ion energy spectra in the downstream region. Our approach underscores computationally efficient and physically more accurate modeling of shock-driven turbulence, downstream plasma relaxation, and concomitant ion heating in the shock frame. The new method can be used for exploring ion relaxation at interplanetary (IP) shocks, more efficient studies of cosmic rays (CRs) and plasma turbulence, and more accurate predictions of seed populations of Solar Energetic Particles (SEPs) at heliospheric shocks driven by coronal mass ejections (CMEs).

physics.space-ph↗

Validation of Space Weather Forecasting at Leonid Space

We validate Leonid Space's space weather forecasts through comprehensive cross-validation of retroforecasts scored against the entire F10.7 and Ap historical record. We built a unified forecast model that jointly forecasts F10.7 and Ap on all timescales from 3 hours up to multi-decade chains of future solar cycles. This was used to generate an archive of historical 15-year retroforecasts, after performing a leave-one-out fit of the model on held-out data and conditioning only on historical data available at the time. The accuracy of this archive was scored against measured space weather indices at all lookahead horizons from 1 day to 15 years, using the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) as the primary quality metric. All other publicly available F10.7 and Ap forecast archives were scored using the same approach, including NASA's MSAFE and Schatten forecasts, SWPC's 27-day, 45-day, and Solar Cycle predictions, SWPC/USAF's RSGA, SIDC's Ursigram, CLS, Athens, KSO, BGS, SEPC's 3-day and 27-day forecasts, AFRL/NSO's SIFT, and BoM. Taken together, these 15 flux forecasts and 12 Ap forecasts compared on common lookahead metrics make up the most comprehensive cross-comparison of space weather forecasts we are aware of. Over a common forecast interval since 2000, Leonid had the lowest CRPS prediction error of any F10.7 or Ap prediction model: strictly lowest for Ap at all lookaheads and for F10.7 up to 5 years, and parity with MSAFE after 5 years. Much of this performance comes from our well-calibrated uncertainty bands, and we urge space weather forecasters to include calibrated uncertainties with their predictions and to issue retroforecast archives that can be used to rigorously evaluate their generating models.

physics.space-ph↗

Coordinate Systems and Transforms in Space Physics: Terms, Definitions, Implementations, and Recommendations for Reproducibility

In space physics, acronyms for coordinate systems (e.g., \texttt{GEI}, \texttt{GSM}) are commonly used; however, differences in their definitions and implementations can prevent reproducibility. In this work, we compare definitions in online resources, software packages, and frequently cited journal articles and show that implementation differences can lead to transformations between same-named coordinate systems and position values from different data providers to differ significantly. Based on these comparisons and results, and to enable reproducibility, we recommend that (a) a standard for acronyms and definitions for coordinate systems is developed, similar to equivalents in astronomy or earth sciences; (b) a standards body develops a citable database of reference data needed for these transforms. For software that computes coordinate transforms, we also recommend that their developers provide explicit comparisons of their implementations with the results of (b) and documentation on implementation choices. Additionally, we provide recommendations for scientists and metadata developers to ensure that sufficient information is provided to enable reproducibility. Finally, we document that spacecraft positions from data providers can differ both because of differences in how they implemented transforms and because of differences in the original source of the position data, and provide recommendations to improve the documentation of spacecraft positional datasets.

physics.space-ph↗