Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.20045

Testing for Peer Effects in Heteroskedastic Fixed-Effects Panels

Abstract

We study testing for peer effects in linear panel models with individual and time fixed effects when the interaction network is unspecified. We propose a quadratic-form test based on the Gram matrix of residualized peer covariates. A key difficulty is that fixed-effects removal and nuisance estimation destroy the centering of a conventional leave-diagonal-out quadratic form under conditional heteroskedasticity. We introduce a leverage adjustment that restores exact conditional centering and combine it with a residual-based variance estimator. The resulting studentized statistic is asymptotically standard normal as both panel dimensions diverge, without imposing any restriction on their relative growth rates. Under additional conditions, we establish consistency against alternatives. The null theory is further extended to covariates that are weakly dependent over time; the same studentization remains valid without an additional long-run variance estimator. Monte Carlo experiments evaluate the finite-sample size and power of the proposed test across different settings and demonstrate its favorable performance relative to the existing benchmark test. Applications to state tax competition and growth spillovers among OECD countries illustrate the practical relevance in testing for peer effects without specifying the interaction network.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Leheng Cai, Weijia Li, Xu Guo. 2026-10-14. Testing for Peer Effects in Heteroskedastic Fixed-Effects Panels. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20045

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Principal stratification with continuous treatments and continuous post-treatment variables

Principal stratification (PS) is a commonly used approach for understanding the mechanisms through which a treatment affects an outcome. The goal of this work is to extend the PS framework to studies with continuous treatments, which introduces a number of both challenges and opportunities in terms of defining causal effects and performing inference. This manuscript provides multiple key methodological contributions: 1) we introduce principal causal estimands for continuous treatments that provide insights into different causal mechanisms, 2) we show that nonparametric identification is possible under a principal ignorability assumption, but only under a restrictive assumption on the joint distribution of potential mediators, which can be dropped under certain parametric assumptions, 3) we utilize nonparametric Bayesian models for the joint distribution of the potential mediating variables to mitigate issues from model misspecification, and 4) we provide theoretical justification for utilizing an outcome model to identify the joint distribution of the potential mediating variables, and show that this is only possible if a principal ignorability assumption is violated. Lastly, we illustrate our methodology by applying it to a novel study of the relationship between the economy and arrest rates, and how this is potentially mediated by police capacity.

stat.ME↗

Controlling the false discovery rate in high-dimensional linear models using model-X knockoffs and $p$-values

We propose a novel multiple testing methodology for controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) in high-dimensional linear models that integrates model-X knockoff techniques with debiased penalized regression estimators. At the foundation of our methodology, we construct and study two sets of naturally paired high-dimensional test statistics and the associated $p$-values for evaluating the same null hypotheses. The first set is shown to be asymptotically mutually independent, justifying the use of the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. We further exploit the pairing structure through a two-step procedure aimed at improving power. Our theoretical results establish the key properties of the framework with respect to asymptotic FDR control and formally characterize the associated power gains of the two-step procedure. Importantly, our framework accommodates general dependence in the design matrix. Extensive simulations demonstrate that our methods outperform existing approaches -- particularly those relying on empirical FDP estimates -- in both power and FDR control accuracy, with notable gains in settings involving weaker signals, small sample sizes, or low target FDR levels.

stat.ME↗

Measuring frailty in the elderly: an indicator based on a super-classifier

Identifying frail older adults in an ageing population is essential for improving healthcare services. This study proposes a composite indicator to assess individual frailty levels using administrative healthcare data. Given the complex and multidimensional nature of frailty, a multi-outcome approach is adopted. Following an extensive literature review, a set of adverse health events is selected as proxies for frailty. These events were modelled using logistic classifiers, with frailty determinants (associated to adverse health events, selected using a gradient tree boosting) serving as covariates. The sensitivity and specificity of each classifier is used to compose their combined likelihood. From this, we derive an indicator capable of quantifying frailty across the population. The indicator shows robust performance across multiple outcomes and over time. Its primary innovation lies in allowing the use of diverse and outcome-specific sets of frailty determinants without any structural constraint. Overall, we offer an effective tool for quantifying frailty among older adults, potentially supporting health authorities in the prevention of frailty-related adverse events.

stat.ME↗