Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.21756

Locally Robust Inference with Outcomes Predicted by Machine Learning

Abstract

Many parameters of interest in economics depend on outcomes generated by machine learning (ML).These generated outcomes are subsequently used in standard econometric estimation and typically treated as observed, a practice that threatens the validity of downstream inference. Empirically relevant cases include dynamic treatment effects under sequential exogeneity, long-term effects with surrogates, the partially linear model with an ML-predicted outcome, productivity persistence with an unrestricted production function and constructed instruments, and outcomes residualized of confounding variation. This paper develops a three-step locally robust GMM framework for valid inference when the dependent variable is generated by ML. We construct a debiased moment condition that augments the identifying moment with first- and second-step influence functions, making inference on the parameter of interest locally insensitive to regularization and model selection biases at both steps. We establish consistency and asymptotic normality of the proposed estimator and illustrate its finite-sample performance through Monte Carlo simulations. We also apply the method to U.S. mortgage data to study conditional Black--White disparities in a race-blind ML default-risk score. The score predicts subsequent default well overall, but the conditional disparity embedded in the score is much smaller than the corresponding disparity in realized serious delinquency; accounting for first-step estimation also raises the naive out-of-sample estimate of the score disparity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Juan Carlos Escanciano, Alejandro Puerta-Cuartas. 2026-10-15. Locally Robust Inference with Outcomes Predicted by Machine Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21756

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Estimating treatment-effect heterogeneity across sites, in multi-site randomized experiments with few units per site

Multi-site randomized experiments, which are common in economics and medicine, can reveal how treatment effects vary across settings. However, differences between site-specific estimates reflect both treatment-effect heterogeneity and estimation noise. We build on established measurement-error corrections and develop new ones to study this heterogeneity in experiments with many sites and few units per site. In particular, our results can be used to estimate the variance and centered third moment of treatment effects across sites, relate site effects to untreated outcomes, conduct mediation analyses, assess the roles of provider effectiveness and site responsiveness, and study heterogeneity in local average treatment effects (LATEs) under imperfect compliance. We apply our methods to counseling programs delivered by public and private providers in about 200 French employment offices. Average employment gains of about 2 percentage points conceal cross-site standard deviations of intention-to-treat effects of 8 to 9 percentage points. We also find substantial LATE heterogeneity.Effects are negatively associated with untreated employment rates. The two programs also tend to be more effective in the same sites, consistent with a role for heterogeneous site responsiveness.

econ.EM↗

Efficient GMM and Weighting Matrix under Misspecification

This paper develops efficient GMM estimation under misspecified moment conditions. The influence function of the standard GMM estimator under misspecification depends on both the moment conditions and their Jacobian, motivating a new class of estimators based on augmented, recentered moment conditions. Standard GMM is a special case and generally suboptimal. By optimally weighting the augmented system, we obtain a misspecification-efficient (ME) estimator with the smallest asymptotic variance for the same GMM estimand. In linear models, its asymptotic variance takes the textbook form $(G'W^{*}G)^{-1}$, where $W^{*}$ is the inverse variance of the residualized moments after projection on the Jacobian $G$. We propose a feasible bootstrap estimator, which is a misspecification-robust and efficient version of the Hall and Horowitz (1996) bootstrap GMM estimator. Finally, we establish uniform local asymptotic minimax bounds over a class of weighting matrices. We illustrate the proposed methods in simulation and two empirical examples.

econ.EM↗

Identification and Inference for Algorithmic Frontiers with Selective Labels

This paper provides identification results to characterize a fairness-accuracy (FA) frontier, and statistical inference tools to test hypotheses and build a confidence set for the FA-frontier, when outcomes are observed only for selected individuals. When the selection process is unrestricted but loss is measured in specific ways, we provide a characterization of the sharp identification region of the FA-frontier. When the observed distribution rules out frontier membership for a binary status quo algorithm, we construct a single alternative algorithm that improves both groups' accuracy without worsening fairness, uniformly over all admissible distributions of missing labels. For any loss functions, under selection on observables and strict overlap assumptions, we obtain point identification and propose a debiased machine learning estimator, derive its asymptotic distribution, and show how this can be used to carry out inference for the FA-frontier.

econ.EM↗