Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.22786

MultiPASE: Shape-Aware Comparative 3D Genome Analysis

Abstract

3D genome structures reconstructed from Hi-C data provide valuable insights into chromatin organization, but comparing them across conditions and time points remains challenging because of noise, variability, and arbitrary orientation. State-of-the-art comparison approaches often rely on contact-matrix-based summaries, which do not preserve the spatial geometry of the reconstructed structures and make integration with gene expression and chromatin accessibility difficult. There is therefore a need for robust structural alignment and spatial abstraction methods that support integrated analysis across conditions and time points. We present MultiPASE, a computational pipeline for comparative analysis of reconstructed 3D genome structures represented as gene-level spatial point clouds. MultiPASE aligns point clouds into a shared coordinate frame using coarse-to-fine rigid registration with PCA-based axis disambiguation and robust ICP refinement, then summarizes spatial organization using two complementary shape abstraction methods that produce stable, nested, multi-scale representations from dense core regions to broader structural extent. Using Hi-C-derived reconstructions from viral infection experiments, we show how the approach reveals condition-dependent structural changes that are difficult to interpret from raw 3D structures alone. By integrating spatial structure with gene expression and chromatin accessibility, MultiPASE supports interactive analysis of spatial organization and gene relocation patterns. A quantitative validation, reported in the Supplementary Materials, shows that the proposed shape abstractions preserve non-convex features, remain stable across samples, and that the alignment pipeline is necessary for meaningful comparison. A usage case and a usability evaluation with eight participants demonstrate the pipeline's effectiveness for comparative structural analysis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N. Nipu, G. Johnson, C. Roth, D. Rogers, S. R. Starkenburg, C. R. Steadman, G. E. Marai. 2026-10-16. MultiPASE: Shape-Aware Comparative 3D Genome Analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22786

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Dynamic response phenotypes and model discrimination in systems and synthetic biology

Biological systems encode function not primarily in steady states, but in the structure of transient responses elicited by time-varying stimuli. Overshoots, biphasic dynamics, adaptation kinetics, fold-change detection, entrainment, and cumulative exposure effects often determine phenotypic outcomes, yet are poorly captured by classical steady-state or dose-response analyses. This paper develops an input-output perspective on such "dynamic phenotypes," emphasizing how qualitative features of transient behavior constrain underlying network architectures independently of detailed parameter values. A central theme is the role of sign structure and interconnection logic, particularly the contrast between monotone systems and architectures containing antagonistic pathways. We show how incoherent feedforward (IFF) motifs provide a simple and recurrent mechanism for generating non-monotonic and adaptive responses across multiple levels of biological organization, from molecular signaling to immune regulation and population dynamics. Conversely, monotonicity imposes sharp impossibility results that can be used to falsify entire classes of models from transient data alone. Beyond step inputs, we highlight how periodic forcing, ramps, and integral-type readouts such as cumulative dose responses offer powerful experimental probes that reveal otherwise hidden structure, separate competing motifs, and expose invariances such as fold-change detection. Throughout, we illustrate how control-theoretic concepts, including monotonicity, equivariance, and input-output analysis, can be used not as engineering metaphors, but as precise mathematical tools for biological model discrimination. Thus we argue for a shift in emphasis from asymptotic behavior to transient and input-driven dynamics as a primary lens for understanding, testing, and reverse-engineering biological networks.

q-bio.QM↗

Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for Smartphone-Derived Gait Measures in Multiple Sclerosis

Background: Digital health technologies allow for frequent, remote gait monitoring in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, to differentiate daily variability from actual disease progression in longitudinal data, established minimal clinically important differences (MCID) are required. Currently, there is limited literature defining these thresholds for digital gait metrics. Objective: To establish MCIDs for digital gait measures reflecting progression in MS. Methods: Digital gait measures were captured via daily, remote, smartphone-based Two-Minute Walk Tests in CONSONANCE (NCT03523858), a phase 3b study of ocrelizumab in progressive MS. Using an anchor-based approach, median changes from baseline at Week 96 on digital gait measures were computed for patients showing clinically meaningful worsening on either Timed 25-Foot Walk, Ambulation Score, Expanded Disability Status Scale, or 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale. These changes were subsequently triangulated to derive the MCID estimates. Results: 243 patients with progressive MS (female: n=125 (51%); mean [SD] age: 49.3 [9.3]; mean [SD] EDSS: 4.8 [1.4]) had digital gait data available at baseline and Week 96. Median changes were generally consistent across anchors. Triangulated MCIDs are: Step Velocity = -0.16 m/s, Step Velocity Scaled to Walking Time = -0.18 m/s, Step Duration = 0.06 s, Step Length = -0.07 m, Total Number of Steps = -28, and Total Distance Walked = -24 m. Conclusion: These MCIDs provide a framework for interpreting meaningful gait changes and integrating digital measures into MS outcome evaluation. Beyond facilitating novel clinical trial endpoints to evaluate treatment efficacy, they enable objective, real-world monitoring to advance personalized patient care.

q-bio.QM↗

gpuGEM: GPU-based linear optimisation of genome-scale metabolic models

Summary: Genome-scale metabolic models increasingly challenge CPU linear-programming solvers in repeated-optimisation workflows. We present gpuGEM, an open-source Python library for GPU-based GEM optimisation using NVIDIA cuOpt, with size-adaptive settings validated against HiGHS and Gurobi. Across a ten-model benchmark suite spanning four orders of magnitude in problem size, gpuGEM achieved speed-ups of 1.1x to 94x relative to the faster of the HiGHS dual-simplex and interior-point methods for each model. gpuGEM also outperformed Gurobi on three of ten models, with speed-ups of 1.6x to 2.5x. In a candidate-gene prioritisation workflow, gpuGEM reduced end-to-end query time from 41 s to 21 s. Availability and Implementation: gpuGEM is released under the MIT licence at https://github.com/Digital-Metabolic-Twin-Centre/gpuGEM and on PyPI (pip install gpugem). An archived release(v0.1.2) is available at https://zenodo.org/records/23422813. gpuGEM requires an NVIDIA GPU, Python 3.11 or later, CUDA 12 and cuOpt 26.6 or later. cuOpt requires a GPU with Volta architecture or newer (compute capability 7.0 or newer). Contact: ronan.mt.fleming@gmail.com Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

q-bio.QM↗