Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.22897

When to Forget: Risk-Controlled Context Adaptation for Long-Horizon Agents

Chenle Chen·Yangbo Wei·Zhijie Zheng·Zhenyu Su·Qifan Wang·Junhong Qian·Chao Yao·Chen Wu·Lei He
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Long-horizon agents learn from failure, but the value of a failure record can change as execution progresses. We study when retaining, compressing, or removing the same history block improves subsequent execution relative to full-history KEEP. We introduce RECAP, a framework that combines matched context interventions, execution-relational prediction, and independent policy certification. Matched environment states and rollout seeds measure success and continuation prompt-cost differences; prefix-only relations between a failure block and the current execution propose promising edits. Independent task bundles then select a policy subject to harmful-intervention and non-positive-benefit risk constraints under a fixed measurement protocol. A five-seed longitudinal case holds both the failure block and its summary fixed: compression fails at an early state and becomes a cost-saving intervention at a later state. Across five backbones, RECAP produces positive paired-success saving estimates with backbone-specific reliability-efficiency tradeoffs. On Hunyuan-A13B, it edits 43.24% of retained checkpoints while matching KEEP's observed 91.89% continuation success and reducing unconditional mean continuation prompt cost by 4,619.8 tokens (2.13%). The framework provides an execution-level reference for deciding when to forget: retain history by its value to what comes next.

Explore related subjects

cs.AIcs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chenle Chen, Yangbo Wei, Zhijie Zheng, Zhenyu Su, Qifan Wang, Junhong Qian, Chao Yao, Chen Wu, Lei He. 2026-10-16. When to Forget: Risk-Controlled Context Adaptation for Long-Horizon Agents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22897

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

GVPO: Group Variance Policy Optimization for Large Language Model Post-Training

Post-training plays a crucial role in refining and aligning large language models to meet specific tasks and human preferences. While recent advancements in post-training techniques, such as Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), leverage increased sampling with relative reward scoring to achieve superior performance, these methods often suffer from training instability that limits their practical adoption. As a next step, we present Group Variance Policy Optimization (GVPO). GVPO incorporates the analytical solution to KL-constrained reward maximization directly into its gradient weights, ensuring alignment with the optimal policy. The method provides intuitive physical interpretations: its gradient mirrors the mean squared error between the central distance of implicit rewards and that of actual rewards. GVPO offers two key advantages: (1) it guarantees a unique optimal solution, exactly the KL-constrained reward maximization objective, (2) it supports flexible sampling distributions that avoids on-policy and importance sampling limitations. By unifying theoretical guarantees with practical adaptability, GVPO establishes a new paradigm for reliable and versatile LLM post-training.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

NEXUS: Learning Safety Constraints and Action Models for Safe and Robust Embodied Planning

Large language models (LLMs) enable embodied agents to plan from naturallanguage instructions, yet their actions may be physically infeasible or hazardous. Existing neuro-symbolic learners primarily refine execution models, while formal safety methods acquire or enforce safety constraints. This separation limits the reuse of both execution corrections and safety knowledge across tasks. We present NEXUS, a modular neuro-symbolic framework that jointly maintains a PDDL domain model and an LTL safety specification. Execution failures are used to repair action schemas, whereas detected hazards are converted into reusable LTL constraints through hierarchical semantic and translation sampling with equivalence consensus. Accumulated constraints are enforced through LTL progression during symbolic search; comparing constrained and unconstrained search outcomes distinguishes physical unreachability from safety-induced refusal. Experiments on SafeAgentBench evaluation set show that NEXUS achieves the best overall trade-off between safetask completion and unsafe-task refusal, while maintaining low violation rates under jailbreak attacks. Ablations confirm the complementary benefits of PDDLdomain refinement and LTL-constraint accumulation.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

APeB: Benchmarking Personalization Ability of Large Language Model Agents

LLM-powered agents struggle with personalization when users issue raw, underspecified queries. In this setting, agents must infer latent intent, extract preferences from noisy interaction histories, and select among competing alternatives. Existing benchmarks rarely test this capability, as they often rely on user-refined queries or simplified histories. We introduce personalized product search (PPS), a testbed for agentic personalization under raw queries and diverse histories. We construct Agent Personalized Benchmark (APeB) from action logs, pairing underspecified intents with rich histories and user-viewed candidate items. Evaluating state-of-the-art LLMs with multi-step agent workflows, we find that models handle explicit queries well but struggle with early-stage queries requiring intent and preference discovery. Rubric analysis attributes this gap mainly to ineffective history use. A simple history-aware query-refinement pipeline, VQRA, yields consistent gains, highlighting the need for dedicated history-utilization modules in personalized agents.

cs.AI↗