Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.23387

Bayesian Learning of Parametric Mean Field Games with Common Noise

Abstract

We study the inverse problem of recovering unknown parameters governing the dynamics and rewards of Mean Field Games (MFGs) from partial observations of population trajectories, made stochastic by common noise. The observer seeks to recover a consistent parameter $θ$ via Bayesian inference, facing the challenge that evaluating the likelihood requires solving a new Nash equilibrium (NE) for each candidate $θ$. Due to common noise, the mean-field evolution is stochastic and equilibrium policies are population dependent, which makes solving for each parameter computationally expensive. To overcome this, we introduce the Bayesian-Extended Mean Field Game (BE-MFG), whose single NE simultaneously encodes equilibrium policies for all parameters, enabling efficient learning of the conditional density of mean-field trajectories. We formalize parameter consistency and identifiability in MFGs with common noise and investigate conditions under which consistent parameter recovery is guaranteed. On three synthetic environments of various complexity, we recover the ground-truth parameter accurately from a small number of partial, stochastic observations, outperforming an adaptation of inverse reinforcement learning for MFGs. A fourth experiment, on public electricity market data, suggests that the approach can also be applied to real-world data.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Grégoire Lambrecht, Mathieu Laurière. 2026-10-16. Bayesian Learning of Parametric Mean Field Games with Common Noise. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23387

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Best-of-Both-Worlds Guarantees with Fairer Endings

We study best-of-both-worlds guarantees for the fair division of indivisible goods. Prior work has shown that under additive valuations, there always exists a randomized allocation that is ex-ante stochastic-dominance envy-free (sd-EF) and ex-post envy-free up to one good (EF1). Our work is motivated by the goal of achieving stronger ex-post fairness guarantees such as envy-freeness up to any good (EFX). Towards this goal, we make the following contributions: (i) Our first set of results considers a subdomain of additive valuations called \textit{lexicographic} preferences. On the negative side, we show that ex-ante sd-EF is fundamentally in conflict with ex-post EFX, prompting a relaxation in the ex-ante benchmark. On the positive side, we present a polynomial time algorithm that achieves ex-ante $\max\{1-\frac{2}{n+1},\,\frac{9}{10}\}$-EF and ex-post EFX and Pareto optimality, where $n$ is the number of agents. Our algorithm uses a novel dependent rounding technique that, to the best of our knowledge, is its first application in fair division. (ii) Our second set of results concerns beyond-additive valuations. We present a pseudopolynomial time algorithm for \textit{monotone} valuations that achieves $\frac{1}{2}$-EF and ex-post EFX-with-charity. For \textit{subadditive} valuations, we achieve ex-ante $\frac{1}{3}$-EF and ex-post $\frac{1}{2}$-EFX.

cs.GT↗

Adverse Effects of V2V Adoption on Road Safety

Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication is expected to improve road safety and reduce congestion. However, prior work shows that V2V information sharing under partial adoption may increase congestion and decrease safety. We study whether increasing V2V adoption itself affects road safety. We propose a corrected version of an existing model and analyze its behavior under varying adoption levels. We show that, in some cases, increased V2V adoption can increase accident probability. However, under an optimal signaling policy, the system can ensure that accident probability is non-increasing in the adoption level.

cs.GT↗

Anytime Contracts for AI Services

AI services are prone to moral hazard, as model providers can silently route requests to cheaper, lower-quality models, and the inherent stochasticity of model outputs makes this degradation hard to detect. Contract theory addresses moral hazard by designing payment rules that reward high-quality outputs and prevent strategic overcharging. However, existing frameworks assume interactions of fixed duration, whereas AI services are typically consumed through subscriptions and pay-as-you-go APIs that users can terminate at any time based on observed performance. We show that this flexibility can break standard contracts, opening them up to abuse by either the providers or users. To address this, we extend contract theory to account for unknown exit rules. We formalize the problem as a Principal-Agent game, and show that budget-optimal contracts in this setting are proportional to anytime-valid hypothesis tests based on likelihood-ratio e-values. We give an efficient algorithm for computing anytime contracts and show how betting e-processes can be used to approximate them when the models are unknown. Finally, we evaluate our findings on synthetic data and data from deployed LLMs.

cs.GT↗