Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.23391

Input-output analysis with a sphere packing approach

Abstract

Input-output analysis with linear programming is widely used in the planning of national economies. However, linear programming attains its optimum at a vertex of the feasible set, and a small deviation of the optimal plan in some direction violates a constraint. So far, little attention has been paid to finding sets of production plans which guarantee both the supply-demand balance of an economy and a given level of its gross domestic product (GDP), and the sphere packing approach cannot be applied directly, since the balance equations define a set with an empty interior. In this paper, we introduce the set of $(\varepsilon,δ)$-solutions, in which GDP may be smaller than its optimal value by at most $\varepsilon$ and supply may differ from demand by at most $δ$, and we find a sphere with the maximum radius inscribed into this set by solving a linear programming problem. We prove that the optimal radius is positive for positive tolerances, that it is non-decreasing, concave and piecewise linear with respect to the tolerances, and that it is bounded by the narrowest balance constraint, which is determined by a sales-concentration index of sectors. The approach is applied to the official input-output tables of Mongolia for 2010-2019 and 2024. The classical optimal plan has zero robustness, while the robust plan keeps 99.73% of the maximal GDP and, in a Monte Carlo simulation, tolerates independent deviations of all outputs and final demands of up to $\pm$0.30%. The margin of robust plans is limited by sectors with concentrated sales, mainly education and, increasingly, export-oriented mining, which indicates that a diversification of the users of mining output widens the set of robust plans.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Munkhbayar Byambadash, Tumendelger Lkhagvasuren, Enkhbat Rentsen. 2026-10-16. Input-output analysis with a sphere packing approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23391

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AI-exposed jobs deteriorated before ChatGPT

Public debate links worsening job prospects for AI-exposed occupations to the release of ChatGPT in late 2022. Using monthly U.S. unemployment insurance records, we measure occupation- and location-specific unemployment risk and find that risk rose in AI-exposed occupations beginning in early 2022, months before ChatGPT was released. Analyzing millions of LinkedIn profiles, we show that graduate cohorts from 2021 onward entered AI-exposed jobs at lower rates than earlier cohorts, with gaps opening before late 2022. Finally, from millions of university syllabi, we find that graduates taking more LLM-exposed curricula had shorter job searches after ChatGPT and higher first-job pay when entering highly exposed occupations. Together, these results---pointing to forces pre-dating generative AI and to the ongoing value of LLM-relevant education---suggest that generative AI may not be the root cause of these labor market hardships and that the launch of ChatGPT is a faulty natural experiment for understanding AI's impact on jobs.

econ.GN↗

Understanding the Mechanism of Altruism in Large Language Models

Altruism is fundamental to human societies, fostering cooperation and social cohesion. While recent studies suggest that large language models (LLMs) can display human-like prosocial behavior, the underlying mechanism that produces such behavior remains unclear. We leverage sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to identify a set of features that contribute to an LLM's altruistic choices in the Dictator Game. We show that intervening on these features substantially shifts the model's allocations and produces similar effects in several other social decision scenarios. Together, these results link the model's prosocial output to internal features that can be identified and causally manipulated, providing a transparent approach to studying the computational basis of decision-making in LLMs.

econ.GN↗

Risk Ceilings and Development Deadlines: Pacing AI under Uncertain Safety Productivity

Can a regulator promise both a risk ceiling and a development deadline when safety productivity is unknown? A ceiling below the final model's unprotected hazard requires a minimum stock of safety knowledge, so both promises hold only if weak research can be ruled out. Learning first and then replaying development, with spare compute in safety, comes close to that minimum. In a calibration with only state risk, constant safety yield, and full knowledge transfer, it needs only 3.3 percent more productivity than the necessary bound. Customer services pay for the guarantee. Rules that fix compute allocation fix dates, not risk.

econ.GN↗