arXiv · 2610.23737
Plancherel Decompositions and Distinctions for $\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}\backslash \mathrm{Gl}_{2n+1}$ and $P(\mathrm{Sp}_{2n})\backslash \mathrm{Gl}_{2n}$
Abstract
Let $F$ be a non-Archimedean local field of characteristic zero. We determine the Plancherel decompositions of $\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}(F)\backslash\mathrm{GL}_{2n+1}(F)$ and $P(\mathrm{Sp}_{2n})(F)\backslash\mathrm{GL}_{2n}(F)$, where $P(\mathrm{Sp}_{2n})$ denotes the mirabolic subgroup of $\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}$, and study smooth distinction for both spaces. We carry out the local unfolding procedure of arXiv:1203.0039, Section 9.5, constructing unitary isomorphisms with degenerate Whittaker models by successive Fourier transforms. The isomorphism for the even model is already stated there in Example 9.5.17. The resulting Plancherel formulas are direct integrals of normalized parabolic inductions from the tempered duals of $\mathrm{GL}_n(F)\times\mathrm{GL}_{n+1}(F)$ and $\mathrm{GL}_n(F)\times\mathrm{GL}_n(F)$, respectively, with product Whittaker-Plancherel measures. In the odd case, the parameter map agrees with the prediction of arXiv:2409.04677. Using closed parabolic orbits and local Rankin-Selberg integrals, we prove that all representations induced from these tempered data are distinguished for the corresponding model. We also prove that essentially square-integrable representations are not distinguished for the odd model, and that supercuspidal representations are not distinguished for the even model. For the even model with $n=1,2$, we construct distinguished square-integrable representations outside the Plancherel support. Thus, the smooth tempered distinguished spectrum can be strictly larger than the corresponding $L^2$-spectrum. For $\mathrm{GL}_5(F)$, however, we prove that an irreducible tempered representation is $\mathrm{Sp}_4(F)$-distinguished if and only if it is induced from tempered representations of $\mathrm{GL}_2(F)$ and $\mathrm{GL}_3(F)$.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Sagnik Mukherjee. 2026-10-16. Plancherel Decompositions and Distinctions for $\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}\backslash \mathrm{Gl}_{2n+1}$ and $P(\mathrm{Sp}_{2n})\backslash \mathrm{Gl}_{2n}$. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23737
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.