Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.24216

Spaceflight-associated Motion Sickness in Commercial Crew Astronauts

Torin K. Clark·Aaron A. Allred·Jaime Mateus·Marissa Rosenberg
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Spaceflight-associated motion sickness, including space motion sickness (SMS) and terrestrial readaptation motion sickness (TRMS), has presented as the most operationally limiting effect on the human in the days following a gravity transition. Published data suggest that astronaut head movements provoke symptoms, but those studies rarely controlled for them. Most previous studies use postflight retrospective reporting and have not quantified temporal dynamics or persistence of symptoms; no study has published motion sickness in a cohort of commercial flyers. Here, we comprehensively evaluate SMS and TRMS within commercial flyers (N=8; 4F, 4M) for the first time, across two commercial missions of short duration (Polaris Dawn and Fram2). Utilizing a standard reporting methodology, we find an 87.5% incidence of SMS, which persisted for at least three days on orbit in 25% of crewmembers. The symptoms included vomiting in 62.5% of crewmembers. Regarding TRMS, incidence was 50%, severity was significantly lower than SMS (p = 0.007), and it tended to persist for a shorter duration than SMS for these short-duration flights. These findings establish a systematic baseline for spaceflight-associated motion sickness, informing its operational impact and salience as human spaceflight missions expand in accessibility and scope.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.NC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Torin K. Clark, Aaron A. Allred, Jaime Mateus, Marissa Rosenberg. 2026-10-16. Spaceflight-associated Motion Sickness in Commercial Crew Astronauts. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24216

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Longitudinal fMRI reveals multi-network reconfiguration and a recurrent frontoparietal shift across rest and task states during adult aging

Functional connectivity changes across adult aging, but most evidence is cross-sectional, and covariance-based connectivity depends on blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) fluctuation amplitude. Covariance decline can reflect changing fluctuation amplitude, and its interpretation may depend on whether normalization uses signal amplitude or includes estimated noise. It is also unclear which longitudinal changes recur across brain states. We analyzed 852 adults (baseline age 36-89 years) from the Aging Adult Brain Connectome with repeated functional MRI (fMRI) during rest, inhibitory control, associative memory, and visual-motor processing (2,220 sessions; median follow-up 5.5 years). Baseline age and elapsed follow-up were modeled separately. Ten cortical networks were tested jointly across states, and covariance was normalized either by released signal amplitude or by a candidate total amplitude reconstructed from released signal and noise amplitudes. Native common covariance declined by 7-11% per 5 years, while signal pair amplitude declined by 9% on average across states, significantly more than estimated noise pair amplitude. Under signal normalization, the relative balance among networks reconfigured over follow-up and differed across states, and the frontoparietal network shifted positively relative to the other nine networks in all four states, by 5-8% per 5 years. The estimated common trajectory was near zero under signal normalization but declined by 4-7% per 5 years under candidate total normalization. The network reconfiguration and the positive frontoparietal-relative direction persisted under both. Within-person coupling between the frontoparietal shift and fluid cognition was not detected. Adult aging thus combines normalization-dependent overall change with a state-dependent redistribution among networks that includes a recurrent frontoparietal shift.

q-bio.NC↗
arXiv2026

Disentanglement with Biological Constraints: A Theory of Functional Cell Types

Neurons in the brain are often finely tuned for specific task variables. Moreover, such disentangled representations are highly sought after in machine learning. Here we mathematically prove that simple biological constraints on neurons, namely nonnegativity and energy efficiency in both activity and weights, promote such sought after disentangled representations by enforcing neurons to become selective for single factors of task variation. We demonstrate these constraints lead to disentanglement in a variety of tasks and architectures, including variational autoencoders. We also use this theory to explain why the brain partitions its cells into distinct cell types such as grid and object-vector cells, and also explain when the brain instead entangles representations in response to entangled task factors. Overall, this work provides a mathematical understanding of why single neurons in the brain often represent single human-interpretable factors, and steps towards an understanding task structure shapes the structure of brain representation.

q-bio.NC↗
arXiv2026

Inter- and Intra-Subject Variability in EEG: A Systematic Survey

Electroencephalography (EEG) underpins neuroscience, clinical neurophysiology, and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), yet pronounced inter- and intra-subject variability limits reliability, reproducibility, and translation. This systematic review studies that quantified or modeled EEG variability across resting-state, event-related potentials (ERPs), and task-related/BCI paradigms (including motor imagery and SSVEP) in healthy and clinical cohorts. Across paradigms, inter-subject differences are typically larger than within-subject fluctuations, but both affect inference and model generalization. Stability is feature-dependent: alpha-band measures and individual alpha peak frequency are often relatively reliable, whereas higher-frequency and many connectivity-derived metrics show more heterogeneous reliability; ERP reliability varies by component, with P300 measures frequently showing moderate-to-good stability. We summarize major sources of variability (biological, state-related, technical, and analytical), review common quantification and modeling approaches (e.g., ICC, CV, SNR, generalizability theory, and multivariate/learning-based methods), and provide recommendations for study design, reporting, and harmonization. Overall, EEG variability should be treated as both a practical constraint to manage and a meaningful signal to leverage for precision neuroscience and robust neurotechnology.

q-bio.NC↗