Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.24253

Sharp Gromov Hyperbolicity Constants for Cartesian Products of Finitely Many Trees

Abstract

Let $X=T_1\times\cdots\times T_k$, $k\ge2$, be a Cartesian product of finite nontrivial trees with unit edges, and write $d_i=\diam T_i$, $S=\sum_id_i$ and $M=\max_id_i$. We prove that the thin-triangle hyperbolicity constant of the geodesic realization of $X$ is \[ \Rips(X)=\min\Bigl\{\frac S2,\ S-M+\frac12\Bigr\}, \] and that the four-point hyperbolicity constant of its vertex metric is the value \[ \mathcal{P}(d_1,\dots,d_k) = \max_{E\subseteq\{1,\dots,k\}} \min\left\{ \sum_{i\in E} d_i,\, \sum_{i\notin E} d_i \right\}. \] of the best two-way partition of the diameters. Both constants therefore depend only on the diameter vector, and their difference is governed by the partition imbalance $η$ of that vector: it equals $η/2$ when $M\le S-M$ and $1/2$ otherwise. In particular the two constants coincide if and only if the diameters admit a perfect partition, and their difference is unbounded. For $k\ge3$ the first formula exhibits a many-factor balancing phenomenon: several short factors can collectively balance the longest one and force the universal bound $\frac12\diam X$ to be attained. The proofs are self-contained and rest on an exact distance formula for the geodesic realization of $X$. For the $\ell_1$-product of the factors, i.e.\ the $\ell_1$-metric on the associated cube complex, we obtain $\Rips=\min\{S/2,S-M\}$, which identifies the half-unit above as a pure $1$-skeleton effect, and we show that the four-point formula holds for $\ell_1$-products of arbitrary $0$-hyperbolic metric spaces, in particular for weighted trees and $\R$-trees. We also treat products with unbounded factors and record algorithmic consequences.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Junior Michel, Anier Soria Lorente, Jean Marie-Vilaire. 2026-10-16. Sharp Gromov Hyperbolicity Constants for Cartesian Products of Finitely Many Trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24253

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Spherical Hadwiger Theorem

We prove the spherical Hadwiger theorem in every dimension: for $n\geq1$, every continuous $\mathrm{SO}(n+1)$-invariant valuation on all closed spherical convex sets in the unit sphere $\mathbb{S}^n$ is a unique linear combination of the spherical intrinsic volumes $V_0,\ldots,V_n$. The same classification holds on sets contained in an open hemisphere, with unique continuous invariant extension to the full domain. We first classify simple invariant valuations by an independent induction on dimension. Averaging a signed cone identity gives the spherical volume term; the remaining terms are signed coning transforms that vanish by the lower-dimensional simple classification. A second induction, together with extension to non-proper sets, gives the general classification. The cone--sphere correspondence yields, for $d\geq2$, the corresponding classification on all closed convex cones in $\mathbb{R}^d$, without normalization at the zero cone. In both settings, $\mathrm{SO}$-invariance implies $\mathrm{O}$-invariance.

math.MG↗

Infinitesimally Euclidean metric surfaces

We prove the equivalence of several notions of infinitesimally Euclidean-like behaviour for metric surfaces appearing in the literature. We obtain in particular that metric surfaces with property (ET) are universally infinitesimally Hilbertian.

math.MG↗

Tiling a triangle into a prime number of congruent triangles

We prove that if a triangle is cut into $N$ congruent triangles and $N$ is prime, then $N=2$, $N=3$, or $N\equiv 1 \pmod 4$, and every such $N$ occurs. In particular, if $N > 3$ then $N$ is not a prime congruent to $3$ modulo $4$. The argument divides into cases according to possible shapes of the tiled triangle. Let $α,β,γ$ be the angles of the tile. Prior to this posting, there remained several open shapes. The two most difficult shapes were $(2α,β,α+β)$, the {\em triquadratic} shape, and $(β,β,3α)$, the {\em isosceles-$β$} shape, in which $3α+2β= π$ and $α$ is not a rational multiple of $π$. A previous version of this paper relied on incorrect proofs of those cases, which have been retracted, and are replaced here by correct proofs. For each of those two shapes the number of tiles has the form $N = j^2 N_0$, where $N_0 > 1$ is determined by the shape of the tile and $j$ is a positive integer; so $N$ is prime, or even squarefree, only if $j = 1$. We prove by geometric reasoning that neither shape admits a tiling with $j = 1$, which shows that for both shapes $N$ is never prime, and indeed never squarefree. The shape $(β,β,3α+β)$ (where $3α+ 3β= π$) has been settled by Bonfioli. In this paper, we settle the remaining cases, by number-theoretic arguments based on the area equation. Those proofs rule out $N$ prime, but not $N$ squarefree, and we give examples to show that tilings with squarefree $N$ do sometimes exist.

math.MG↗