arXiv · 2610.27257
When Models Know but Can't Linearly Say: Relational Encoding Limits Linear Vulnerability Classification in Code LLMs
Abstract
Large language models can detect vulnerable code, yet the form of vulnerability encoding in their representations remains unclear. We analyze 8 code models spanning 6.7B-15B parameters on C programs using three datasets (DELTASECOMMITS, SVEN, and PRECISE-BUGS), comparing two diagnostic tasks on the same representations: identifying what patterns the code instantiates, and determining whether it is vulnerable. Models encode the first with high fidelity. Under the studied paired C-code datasets and linear-probing setup, vulnerability information is more accessible as a paired relational signal-whether code A is riskier than code B-than as a globally separable categorical label. This structural difference has implications for classification: the model reliably ranks which code is riskier but standard classifiers on isolated samples achieve limited accuracy because vulnerable and secure samples form overlapping distributions in representation space.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Rui Melo, Andre Catarino, Claudia Mamede, Corina Pasareanu, Rui Abreu. 2026-10-19. When Models Know but Can't Linearly Say: Relational Encoding Limits Linear Vulnerability Classification in Code LLMs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27257
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.