Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.27772

Variance estimation for generalized linear regression with binary outcome when using case-cohort data

Lola Etievant
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The case-cohort design was initially proposed for studying rare outcomes in large cohorts, where covariates may be too expensive to measure on all the subjects. Because of its sampling scheme, this design often requires intricate variance estimation. However, there is significantly less publications on the use of case-cohort data with binary outcomes than for case-cohort survival analysis, notably regarding inference. In this work, an influence-based variance estimation method is proposed for parameters obtained from log-linear or logistic regression models and case-cohort data. The approach is flexible and is illustrated on two cohort subsampling designs: (i) a design possibly stratified on some correlate of the covariates but where sampling of the cases is exhaustive; (ii) a design where the sampling is further stratified based on case status. The variance estimation method properly accounts for the sampling features and allows appropriate analysis of case-cohort data. It is illustrated on a simulation and on data from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group. Influences, and therefore variance estimates, can be easily computed from outputs of standard R commands such as glm and glmgee. In addition to being much less computationally intensive, influence-based variance estimation is more reliable than bootstrap variance estimation, recently proposed by Noma [Journal of Epidemiology, 2024].

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lola Etievant. 2026-10-20. Variance estimation for generalized linear regression with binary outcome when using case-cohort data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27772

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Estimation of Treatment Effects Under Nonstationarity via the Truncated Policy Gradient Estimator

Randomized experiments (or A/B tests) are widely used to evaluate interventions in dynamic systems such as recommendation platforms, marketplaces, and digital health. In these settings, interventions affect both current and future system states, so estimating the global average treatment effect (GATE) requires accounting for temporal dynamics, which is especially challenging in the presence of nonstationarity; existing approaches suffer from high bias, high variance, or both. In this paper, we address this challenge via the novel Truncated Policy Gradient (TPG) estimator, which replaces instantaneous outcomes with short-horizon outcome trajectories. The estimator admits a policy gradient interpretation: it is a truncation of the first-order approximation to the GATE, yielding explicit bias and variance bounds in nonstationary Markovian settings. For a fixed truncation size, we establish a central limit theorem and, under an additional mean-stability condition, the consistency of a variance estimator for nonstationary single-trajectory data. We validate our theory with two real-world case studies. The results show that relative to existing approaches, a well-calibrated TPG estimator can achieve a favorable balance between bias and variance in nonstationary settings, highlighting the value of the policy-gradient perspective for designing effective estimators under complex dynamics.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Weak Factor Analysis via Temporally Weighted PCA

Principal component analysis (PCA) is arguably the most widely used approach for large-dimensional factor analysis. While it is effective when the factors are sufficiently strong, it can be inconsistent when the factors are weak and/or the noise has complex dependence structure. We argue that the inconsistency often stems from bias and introduce a general approach to restore consistency. Specifically, we propose a general weighting scheme for PCA and show that suitable weights can restore consistency for much weaker factors under the dependent-noise structures allowed by our model. Under the stronger signal-to-noise conditions needed for inference, we also establish asymptotic normality of the loading and factor estimators. While an oracle weighting matrix may require knowledge about the factors and covariance of the idiosyncratic noise that are not known a priori, we develop an agnostic approach to adaptively choose from a large class of weighting matrices that can be viewed as PCA for weighted linear combinations of auto-covariances among the observations. Theoretical and numerical results demonstrate the merits of our methodology over the usual PCA and other recently developed techniques for large-dimensional approximate factor models.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

RAPSEM: Identifying Latent Mediators Without Sequential Ignorability via a Rank-Preserving Structural Equation Model

Standard structural equation models (SEMs) are often used to identify latent mediators. However, valid inference typically relies on the strong, frequently violated Sequential Ignorability assumption. We introduce the Rank-Preserving Structural Equation Model (RAPSEM), which increases robustness through G-estimation while maintaining the measurement model's integrity through a two-stage method of moments (2SMM) for factor score corrections. RAPSEM replaces the no unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding with the weaker no unobserved effect modification assumption. By leveraging treatment randomization, RAPSEM achieves identification in a manner equivalent to instrumental variable estimation through structurally emerging instruments. Specifically, identification relies on treatment-covariate interactions that influence the mediator but have no direct effect on the outcome, allowing researchers to utilize natural heterogeneity in treatment response as a testable source of identification. We provide a robustness assessment for the core identifying assumption and establish the consistency and asymptotic normality of the resulting estimator. Simulation studies demonstrate that RAPSEM remains unbiased under unobserved confounding, whereas standard SEM yields biased results. RAPSEM achieves reasonable power for sample sizes above 500, depending on the strength of the structural instruments. The method is implemented in the accompanying rapsem R package, and its practical utility is illustrated through an empirical example from educational research. The code is available at https://github.com/PsychometricsMZ/RAPSEM.

stat.ME↗