Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.28637

To Keep or Not to Keep: Learning KV Cache Retention in Disaggregated LLM Serving Systems

Abstract

Disaggregated \textsc{LLM} serving separates prefill and decode across node pools, placing a network fabric between \textsc{KV}-cache computation and consumption. This breaks a key assumption of classical cache policies: a miss no longer incurs only local recomputation, but also network transfer to the decode node. Likewise, admitting a block to the global cache requires an additional transfer, so poor retention decisions waste both memory and bandwidth. We present \textbf{KVLearn}, a learning-based framework for cost-aware \textsc{KV}-cache retention in disaggregated serving. KVLearn includes: (i) a lightweight Prefix Reuse Predictor (\textsc{PRP}) that estimates reuse probability from structural and temporal prefix features without modifying model weights; (ii) a Cost-Aware Retention Score (\textsc{CARS}) that converts reuse probability into keep/admit decisions using recomputation, transfer, and storage costs; and (iii) an Adaptive Threshold Controller (\textsc{ATC}) that adjusts admission thresholds online from observed hit rates and memory pressure. We integrate KVLearn into a globally disaggregated serving topology and evaluate it on text and multimodal workloads, including large image/video-derived \textsc{KV} blocks with heterogeneous reuse patterns. KVLearn reduces end-to-end time-to-first-token by up to 56% versus No-Cache, 38% versus LRU-Pool, and 33% versus Mooncake-style baselines, while cutting inter-node \textsc{KV} transfer volume by up to 53% versus LRU-Pool. On MM-Session, throughput remains within ${\sim}5%$ of oracle. Code is available at https://github.com/FastLM/KVLearn.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dong Liu, Yanxuan Yu, Eric Jiang, Shu Wang, Ying Nian Wu. 2026-08-10. To Keep or Not to Keep: Learning KV Cache Retention in Disaggregated LLM Serving Systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28637

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Subspace Node Pruning

Node pruning is the art of removing computational units such as neurons, filters, attention heads, or even entire layers to significantly reduce inference time while retaining network performance. In this work, we show that a broad family of importance measures, from activation-based to Fisher-based, share a common quadratic form. Through a lower-triangular change of basis, this form yields a pruning subspace in which entire nodes can be removed while the impact of the lost units is simultaneously recovered via linear least squares. Furthermore, the importance measures within our subspace are decoupled and additive through an orthogonalization of the layer activations, allowing multi-node pruning within layers without interference between importance scores. Our method, Subspace Node Pruning (SNP), outperforms the compared baselines on VGG-16 and ResNet-50 on ImageNet. On OPT-125M and LLaMA-2 7B, SNP matches the state-of-the-art LLM Surgeon at a 40-shot schedule and outperforms it whenever fewer shots are used, all without any retraining after pruning.

cs.LG↗

On the growth of the parameters of approximating ReLU neural networks

This work focuses on the analysis of fully connected feed forward ReLU neural networks as they approximate a given, smooth function. In contrast to conventionally studied universal approximation properties under increasing architectures, e.g., in terms of width or depth of the networks, we are concerned with the asymptotic growth of the parameters of approximating networks. Such results are of interest, e.g., for error analysis or consistency results for neural network training. The main result of our work is that, for a ReLU architecture with state of the art approximation error, the realizing parameters grow at most polynomially. The obtained rate with respect to a normalized network size is compared to existing results and is shown to be superior in most cases, in particular for high dimensional input.

cs.LG↗

Correlations Are Ruining Your Gradient Descent

Natural gradient descent, and the preconditioned optimizers which have followed from it, correct gradient descent by estimating curvature and applying its inverse to the gradient. For any single layer of a deep neural network, this correction can be shown to approximately separate into two factors: one which accounts for correlations in the gradient signal, and one which accounts for correlations in the data arriving at that layer. Herein we show that this second factor can be expressed as a change of basis rather than of curvature and, considered thus, it can be removed from the optimizer entirely and placed within the network itself. Specifically, we show that, once forward weights are corrected, right-sided natural gradient descent can be implemented in a form which has three exactly equivalent forms: a gradient preconditioner, a decorrelating linear transform in the forward pass, or a set of recurrent dynamics in which all updates are Hebbian and rely only upon locally available signals. The (recurrent) decorrelation method we discover aligns closely with proposed methods for inhibitory learning and homeostatic plasticity in the brain. Notably, our transform requires no matrix inverse, no matrix decomposition, and no information beyond that which is available at an individual synapse. It can therefore be applied in distributed and physically constrained systems, including neuromorphic hardware and nervous systems, where existing preconditioners cannot. We demonstrate its effectiveness empirically in convolutional and residual network models while significantly improving a range of approximate biologically plausible methods for credit assignment.

cs.LG↗