Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.28918

Query Feedback and Teaching for Stable and Certifiable Language Generation

Farnam Mansouri·Alireza F. Pour·Grigoris Velegkas·Sandra Zilles
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Language generation in the limit studies whether a learner observing an enumeration of an unknown target language can eventually generate only valid, previously unseen elements. We study stability, introduced by Kalavasis, Mehrotra, and Velegkas (2025), which requires the generator's infinite output set to eventually remain unchanged, and introduce the stronger notion of certifiability, which requires the generator to determine from its observations that its current output is valid. Drawing on teaching sets in learning theory, we introduce a hierarchy of teaching dimensions for generation under three increasingly strict success criteria: correctness, stability, and certifiability. These dimensions measure the minimum number of selected examples whose appearance guarantees the corresponding success condition. We also study stability and certifiability in the membership-query model of Charikar and Pabbaraju (2025). We characterize stable and certifiable generation, both with and without query feedback, and establish their relationships with uniform generation and identification in the limit. In particular, we give a finite-witness characterization of stable generation, analogous to Angluin's tell-tale characterization of identification, resolving a gap left open by Kalavasis, Mehrotra, and Velegkas (2025). We further compare these generation notions with identification in the limit and contrast their teaching requirements on well-studied language families, including regular and erasing pattern languages.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Farnam Mansouri, Alireza F. Pour, Grigoris Velegkas, Sandra Zilles. 2026-10-20. Query Feedback and Teaching for Stable and Certifiable Language Generation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28918

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Subspace Node Pruning

Node pruning is the art of removing computational units such as neurons, filters, attention heads, or even entire layers to significantly reduce inference time while retaining network performance. In this work, we show that a broad family of importance measures, from activation-based to Fisher-based, share a common quadratic form. Through a lower-triangular change of basis, this form yields a pruning subspace in which entire nodes can be removed while the impact of the lost units is simultaneously recovered via linear least squares. Furthermore, the importance measures within our subspace are decoupled and additive through an orthogonalization of the layer activations, allowing multi-node pruning within layers without interference between importance scores. Our method, Subspace Node Pruning (SNP), outperforms the compared baselines on VGG-16 and ResNet-50 on ImageNet. On OPT-125M and LLaMA-2 7B, SNP matches the state-of-the-art LLM Surgeon at a 40-shot schedule and outperforms it whenever fewer shots are used, all without any retraining after pruning.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

On the growth of the parameters of approximating ReLU neural networks

This work focuses on the analysis of fully connected feed forward ReLU neural networks as they approximate a given, smooth function. In contrast to conventionally studied universal approximation properties under increasing architectures, e.g., in terms of width or depth of the networks, we are concerned with the asymptotic growth of the parameters of approximating networks. Such results are of interest, e.g., for error analysis or consistency results for neural network training. The main result of our work is that, for a ReLU architecture with state of the art approximation error, the realizing parameters grow at most polynomially. The obtained rate with respect to a normalized network size is compared to existing results and is shown to be superior in most cases, in particular for high dimensional input.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Correlations Are Ruining Your Gradient Descent

Natural gradient descent, and the preconditioned optimizers which have followed from it, correct gradient descent by estimating curvature and applying its inverse to the gradient. For any single layer of a deep neural network, this correction can be shown to approximately separate into two factors: one which accounts for correlations in the gradient signal, and one which accounts for correlations in the data arriving at that layer. Herein we show that this second factor can be expressed as a change of basis rather than of curvature and, considered thus, it can be removed from the optimizer entirely and placed within the network itself. Specifically, we show that, once forward weights are corrected, right-sided natural gradient descent can be implemented in a form which has three exactly equivalent forms: a gradient preconditioner, a decorrelating linear transform in the forward pass, or a set of recurrent dynamics in which all updates are Hebbian and rely only upon locally available signals. The (recurrent) decorrelation method we discover aligns closely with proposed methods for inhibitory learning and homeostatic plasticity in the brain. Notably, our transform requires no matrix inverse, no matrix decomposition, and no information beyond that which is available at an individual synapse. It can therefore be applied in distributed and physically constrained systems, including neuromorphic hardware and nervous systems, where existing preconditioners cannot. We demonstrate its effectiveness empirically in convolutional and residual network models while significantly improving a range of approximate biologically plausible methods for credit assignment.

cs.LG↗