Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.29584

A Computer-Assisted Proof that R(5,10;5,8)=21 for the Generalized Threshold Ramsey Number

Wancai Guo·Min Wan
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We prove that the generalized threshold Ramsey number R(5,10;5,8) equals 21. This number corresponds to the set Ramsey number r_5(10,8) introduced by Harborth. The proof is computer-assisted. We first enumerate all (4,6;5,8)-good and (5,10;4,4)-good graphs. Then we apply the lucky-vertex inequality derived from the McKay--Radziszowski edge identity to filter candidate pairs for a gluing search, and encode the remaining cases as SAT instances. The search yields exactly 17 non-isomorphic (5,10;5,8;20)-good graphs. Finally, we exclude all one-vertex extensions of these 17 graphs, which proves that no (5,10;5,8;21)-good graph exists.Additionally, we update the tabulation of small set Ramsey numbers r_5(m,n) for 1 <= m,n <= 10.

Explore related subjects

math.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wancai Guo, Min Wan. 2026-10-21. A Computer-Assisted Proof that R(5,10;5,8)=21 for the Generalized Threshold Ramsey Number. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29584

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Domination polynomial of co-maximal graphs of integer modulo ring

We investigate the domination polynomial of the co-maximal graph $Γ(\mathbb{Z}_n)$ related to the ring of integers modulo $n$. Such a polynomial encodes domination sets of all possible sizes, a NP-hard problem for general graph. We give exact formulas for prime powers, integers with two distinct prime divisors, and products of three distinct primes. A prime-support decomposition gives a finite explicit formula for arbitrary $n$, including repeated prime factors. Further results determine the highest coefficients, the precise threshold beyond which every vertex subset dominates, and the number of non-dominating subsets. We discuss unimodality and log-concavity, and derive justified bounds for nonzero domination roots using the Eneström--Kakeya theorem.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

On gcd-graphs over matrix rings

Graphs defined over finite rings are well studied in the literature. The study of these graphs benefits from rich connections between several areas of mathematics, including number theory, algebra, combinatorics, and graph theory, and these connections often lead to interesting interactions between algebraic and combinatorial structures. In this article, we investigate gcd-graphs defined over matrix rings with coefficients in finite fields. We show that these graphs exhibit several interesting graph-theoretic properties. Along the way, we also prove some results on the structure of matrix rings, which may be of independent interest.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

A solution to a conjecture on the signless Laplacian spectral radius for $t$-color-critical graphs

An induced matching is a matching that forms an induced subgraph. A graph is $t$-color-critical if removing some induced matching of size $t$ lowers its chromatic number, but removing any $t-1$ vertices does not. Let $F$ be a $t$-color-critical graph with $χ(F)=r+1$. For sufficiently large $n$, Simonovits determined the unique edge-extremal $F$-free graph on $n$ vertices. Recently, Zheng, Li and Li [Linear Algebra Appl.\ 730 (2026) 546--565] conjectured that, for $t\ge 2$ and $r\ge 3$, the join $K_{t-1}\vee T_{n-t+1,r}$ uniquely maximizes the signless Laplacian spectral radius among all $n$-vertex $F$-free graphs when $n$ is sufficiently large. In this paper, we prove this conjecture. In contrast to the usual spectral arguments, our proof of this conjecture relies on two techniques of a rather different flavour. Our first technique is an analogue of Zykov symmetrization for the signless Laplacian matrix. Our second technique is an induction on $n$, from which we obtain the lower bound on the smallest entry of the Perron vector of a signless Laplacian spectral extremal graph rather than a structural statement.

math.CO↗