Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.31131

Music Between Two Minds: Individual Signatures, Shared States, and the Emergence of Creative Interaction

Abstract

Some of the most valued forms of human creativity arise between people-in conversation, collaboration, and improvised music-yet how two minds jointly regulate the flow of novelty in real time remains unknown. Here we examined the information dynamics of interpersonal improvisation using 986 professional jazz improvisations. Pitch-based fluctuations of uncertainty and surprise behaved as signatures of individual identity: the two partners differed within 90% of takes, performers were identifiable from single solos and the separation between partners persisted undiminished across turns and takes. Rhythm-based fluctuations showed the reverse organization: partners were statistically indistinguishable within a take yet shifted together from take to take, and this shared state drifted gradually as each performance progressed, with each performer moving away from their own past at the same rate as from their partner's. Beyond joint drift, solo hand-offs revealed turn-by-turn complementarity: when one performer exceeded their own average surprise in the predictive dynamics of improvisation, the partner's next solo fell below their own, in both pitch and rhythm and in all duos. Improvising pairs thus neither fuse into one system nor remain two independent ones: they preserve individual melodic voices while sharing a rhythmic state, within which moment-to-moment push-pull continually rebalances their interaction. Individuality and togetherness thus coexist, carried by different musical dimensions, a measurable organization of creativity that emerges between minds.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tatsuya Daikoku, Risa Kobayashi, Rina Tabuchi, Yoshia Abe, Yasuo Kuniyoshi. 2026-10-22. Music Between Two Minds: Individual Signatures, Shared States, and the Emergence of Creative Interaction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31131

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Formalizable Proof of the No-Supervenience Theorem: A Diagonal Limitation on the Viability of Physicalist Theories of Consciousness

The no-supervenience theorem limits the capacity of physicalist theories to provide a comprehensive account of human consciousness. The proof of the theorem is difficult to formalize because it relies on both alethic and epistemic notions of possibility. This article outlines a formalizable proof using predicate modal logic in which the epistemic inferences are expressed in terms of an existing mathematical formalism, the inference device (Wolpert, 2008). The resulting proof shows definitely that any physicalist theory which describes a self-aware, intelligent system must be internally inconsistent.

q-bio.NC↗

Dynamics of random recurrent neural networks: colored noise and sublinear activations

We study the dynamics of recurrent neural networks with random couplings, sublinear odd activation functions, and temporally correlated noise. Using large N methods, we determine stationary correlations and distinguish the loss of local linear stability from the onset of chaos, characterized by a positive largest Lyapunov exponent. These thresholds delimit an intermediate regime in which local instability coexists with asymptotic stability under a common noise history. Their separation depends on both the noise correlation time and the asymptotic growth of the activation function. We show that internal noise with any finite correlation time cuts off the divergence of the network's intrinsic correlation time tau_corr at the edge of chaos; it exhibits a critical scaling tau_{corr,max} propto 1/sqrt{D_0}, where D_0 is the integrated noise strength. Static random input instead produces coincident thresholds and a divergent correlation time. We also calculate the frequency-dependent participation dimension from a four-point correlation function. Its zero-frequency value is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the network correlation time, predicting a smooth minimum at the weak-noise chaos threshold. Numerical simulations support the large-network predictions and reveal appreciable finite-size effects.

q-bio.NC↗

Population Neuroscience 3.0: Bridging large-N and small-N paradigms in brain-wide association studies

Brain-wide association studies (BWAS) leveraging large datasets, have led to divergent and sometimes opposing views on research practices and priorities. The debates span multiple dimensions, including large-N vs.\ small-N sampling, cross-sectional vs.\ longitudinal, observational vs.\ interventional/causal, population generalizability vs.\ individual specificity, data-driven vs.\ hypothesis-driven, prediction-oriented vs.\ explanation-oriented, and molecular/cellular vs.\ systems-level. Taken together, these tensions are not only about methodology, but also about how large-N population studies and small-N, mechanism-focused studies should relate to one another. Shifts along these axes have sharpened disagreements and added to fragmentation in an already heterogeneous field of cognitive neuroscience. Here, we sketch an integrative response grounded in population neuroscience, organized around a closed-loop ``design--analysis--interpretation'' research cycle that aims to build consensus while bridging these divides. Our central claim is that population neuroscience offers a distinctive population-level vantage point for identifying general patterns, characterizing inter-individual variabilities, and benchmarking intra-individual changes, thereby providing reference frameworks through which small-N, mechanism-focused studies can co-evolve with large-N population studies. Population neuroscience is not simply about providing larger N for BWAS; more fundamentally, it is about accumulating cross-scale priors and shared infrastructures for design, analysis, and interpretation across human neuroscience studies. In this sense, we outline a ``third-generation'' agenda for population neuroscience that shifts emphasis from amassing isolated associations to building reference frameworks for cumulative mechanistic and translational research.

q-bio.NC↗