Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.32350

Duality of Shortfall Aversion

Abstract

Shortfall aversion describes a form of consumption habit formation in which an individual's utility depends on consumption relative to the historical consumption peak. This study develops a duality framework for a broad class of utility functions, with and without discounting, avoiding the need for determining the local optimality required by the HJB approaches commonly adopted in the literature. We show that shortfall aversion can instead be incorporated directly into the dual problem through a singular-control mechanism characterized by a variational inequality. Furthermore, we establish that the resulting value function strictly dominates those obtained in the existing literature while remaining attainable under an admissible optimal control. We demonstrate that the suboptimality of existing solutions stems from their myopic treatment of updates to the consumption peak, whereas our duality approach enlarges the admissible class to treat the consumption peak as a separate nondecreasing control and determines its optimal evolution through duality, accounting for future consumption opportunities. These results reveal a previously unrecognized advantage of the dual formulation and provide a more general and flexible framework for consumption optimization under shortfall aversion.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jaehyun Kim, Hoi Ying Wong. 2026-10-23. Duality of Shortfall Aversion. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32350

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Walraswap: equilibrium-based decentralized exchange integrating external AMM liquidity

This article advocates the development of a decentralized exchange protocol for Ethereum based on Walrasian equilibrium. Building on previous work (arXiv:2111.02719, arXiv:2210.04929), it develops a mathematical framework that incorporates liquidity from independent automated market makers (AMMs). Trade orders are represented by continuous monotonic pairwise supply functions and external AMMs are represented by concave swap functions. Under a connectivity condition, we establish the existence of a common clearing-price vector and external swaps that jointly fulfill the prescribed orders while leaving a nonnegative surplus of every token. External AMMs execute ordinary swaps according to their own pricing rules, including swap fees. For the selected clearing-price vector, the prescribed external swaps maximize the value of the batch surplus. We also establish structural properties of equilibrium, including invariance of individual net trades across equilibria, and formulate equilibrium computation as a convex optimization problem. We then outline Walraswap, an exchange protocol for Ethereum with off-chain batch construction and on-chain settlement. Its proposed governance and solver accountability mechanisms aim to encourage public order disclosure and discourage censorship. The protocol design explores how the mathematical construction could support decentralized trading with reduced opportunities for maximal extractable value.

q-fin.MF↗

Partially Active Automated Market Makers

We introduce a new class of automated market maker (AMM), the \emph{partially active automated market maker} (PA-AMM). PA-AMM divides its reserves into two parts, the active and the passive parts, and uses only the active part for trading. At the top of every block, such a division is done again to keep the active reserves always being \(λ\)-portion of total reserves, where \(λ\in (0, 1]\) is an activeness parameter. We show that this simple mechanism reduces adverse selection costs, measured by loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR), and thereby improves the wealth of liquidity providers (LPs) relative to plain constant-function market makers (CFMMs). As a trade-off, the asset weights within a PA-AMM pool may deviate from their target weights implied by its invariant curve. Motivated by the optimal index-tracking problem literature, we also propose and solve an optimization problem that balances such deviation and the reduction of LVR.

q-fin.MF↗

Does the Market Anticipate? Can it? Should it?

A nuance to 'no arbitrage' is studied: it can be suboptimal to act upon an arbitrage immediately; in such cases optimised trading can suppress the anticipation of predictable risk-outcomes, creating an apparent Status Quo Bias. This is shown for asset-pricing under model- or event-risk. Unlike standard treatments, we allow pre-horizon revelations of risk-outcomes; the associated technical challenges are addressed through results from the weak viability and (in)side-information literature. The conflict between 'anticipation', 'no arbitrage' and 'information efficiency', and the competition between the 'signal-to-noise of data' and the 'inference-free risk-premium drift', are exposed.

q-fin.MF↗