Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.32473

From Perception to Pixels: Human-Derived Visually Distinct Colors for Improved Dominant Color Extraction

Abstract

Dominant color extraction is a fundamental task in computer vision, with applications in design, image retrieval, and content recommendation. However, conventional algorithms based on device-oriented color spaces (e.g., RGB) and fixed quantization often fail to capture how humans perceive color differences. In this study, we propose a human-perception-based framework for dominant color extraction, built on a novel Human Color Dictionary (HCD) derived from a perceptual experiment. Participants (n=110) were sequentially shown 120 colors and asked to identify those they perceived as unique. Based on their responses, we constructed a 120 by 120 co-occurrence matrix and applied a greedy selection algorithm to derive 64 perceptually distinct colors, forming the HCD. This dictionary was integrated into RGB color histogram and K-means color extraction algorithms by initializing centroids and mapping pixel values to their nearest perceptual color using the deltaE 00 distance. Evaluation on a dataset of 4,562 images paired with expert-designed palettes demonstrated that our method improves perceptual alignment, as measured by Earth Mover's Distance (EMD) and best-match distance. Our findings suggest no meaningful gender differences in the number of uniquely perceived colors, indicating that sex does not significantly influence color perception in this task. Another key finding is that highly saturated colors are perceived as the most distinguishable, whereas dark and deep colors tend to perceptually collapse and are less reliably differentiated. The results confirm that incorporating experimentally derived human color representations ensures the generated color clusters align more closely with human perception, thus improving the usability of color palette generation in practical applications.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Uldana Shyndali, Nurdaulet Toleugaliyev, Kuat Zharykbayev, Zarina Abildasheva, Pakizar Shamoi. 2026-10-23. From Perception to Pixels: Human-Derived Visually Distinct Colors for Improved Dominant Color Extraction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32473

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Tool and Trainer? Experimental Evidence on Human Learning from Predictive AI in Cancer Diagnosis

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly deployed to aid professional judgment, yet its implications for the development of human expertise remain unclear. We examine how the availability of AI assistance during training and task execution shapes novices' individual and collective judgment in the context of cancer diagnosis. Across two field experiments at a large teaching hospital, 576 medical novices learned to diagnose lung cancer from CT scans. Study 1 used a 2 * 2 factorial design that randomized AI assistance during training, task execution, both, or neither. Novices who received AI assistance during training achieved higher diagnostic accuracy in both AI-assisted and unaided task execution, with a larger improvement in the former. However, training-phase assistance was associated with more common errors than task-execution-phase assistance, suggesting that while the trainer effect improves individual accuracy, it limits the benefits of aggregating judgments. Study 2 shows that AI assistance during earlier task execution improved subsequent unaided performance and reduced common errors in the unaided phase of task execution, thus revealing a surprisingly beneficial "tool-as-trainer" effect. These findings suggest that, contingent on the right deployment strategy, AI assistance can support individual expertise development and improve collective judgment by reducing common errors across individuals.

cs.HC↗

KnowledgeTrail: Understanding Patterns of Exploratory Sensemaking and Serendipitous Discovery in Generative Timelines

Generative AI is reshaping how interactive systems support the discovery and understanding of knowledge, such as how events and ideas developed over time. Yet timelines, one of the most fundamental tools for enabling this kind of temporal sensemaking, remain largely static, limiting user agency and curiosity-driven exploration. Moreover, little is known about how people may explore and make sense of information if the structure of a timeline itself can evolve through interaction. To investigate this question, we designed KnowledgeTrail, a generative timeline that grows and adapts to users' questions, expanding and contracting with their evolving curiosity. Through an exploratory study, we examined how people engage with KnowledgeTrail and identified several patterns of curiosity-driven exploration, serendipitous discovery, and relational sensemaking that differ from conversational AI interfaces. Based on these analyses, our work contributes design implications for future generative systems that support dynamic, user-driven tracing of ideas, events, and their relationships.

cs.HC↗

PAIR-SAFE: A Paired-Agent Approach for Runtime Auditing and Refining AI-Mediated Mental Health Support

LLMs are increasingly used for mental health support, yet they can produce responses that are overly directive, inconsistent, or clinically misaligned. Most risk mitigation approaches rely on implicit alignment through training or prompting, offering limited runtime accountability. We introduce PAIR-SAFE, a paired-agent framework that integrates a Responder agent with a Judge agent grounded in the clinically validated Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI-4). The Judge audits each response and issues \allow{} or \revise{} decisions to guide real-time refinement. We evaluate interactions using a support-seeker simulator derived from human-annotated data. The Judge-supervised interactions show significant improvements in key MITI dimensions, including Partnership, Seek Collaboration, and overall Relational quality. Our quantitative findings are corroborated by expert evaluation, highlighting nuances of runtime supervision. Our study reveals that paired-agent auditing can provide clinically grounded, transparent oversight for AI-assisted mental health support.

cs.HC↗