Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.32735

Optimal Treatment Assignment Rules on Networked Populations

Abhishek Ananth
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

I analyze decision problems where a planner must choose, based on data from an experiment in a pilot population, how to simultaneously distribute a limited number of treatments that generate network spillovers across individuals in a target population. A global treatment rule maps the target population's observed covariates and network features into a jointly feasible allocation. Under local-response, stability, support, and policy-relevant overlap conditions, I identify the resulting welfare using a transported inverse propensity weighted criterion and construct an empirical welfare maximizer. I derive a finite-sample regret bound under restrictions on the complexity of network spillovers and the complexity of the global rule class, measured by its Natarajan dimension. The upper bound uses independent node-level variation, dyadic network formation without imposing a bounded maximum degree. A minimax lower bound establishes a corresponding rate comparison under additional welfare-relevant richness. Finally, I compare oracle optimal global and local rules (which allocate treatments on an individual-by-individual basis) and bound the welfare gap between them. An empirically calibrated oracle comparison illustrates the magnitude of this welfare gap.

Explore related subjects

econ.EM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Abhishek Ananth. 2026-10-23. Optimal Treatment Assignment Rules on Networked Populations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32735

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Instrumented Difference-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Many studies exploit variation in the timing of policy adoption across units as an instrument for treatment. This paper formalizes the underlying identification strategy as a staggered instrumented difference-in-differences (DID-IV). In this design, a Wald-DID estimand, which scales the DID estimand of the outcome by the DID estimand of the treatment, captures the cohort specific local average treatment effect on the treated (CLATT). We propose a credible estimation method in this design that is robust to treatment effect heterogeneity. We also provide simultaneous inference procedures based on the multiplier bootstrap. We illustrate the empirical relevance of our findings, estimating returns to schooling in the United Kingdom. In this application, the two-way fixed effects instrumental variable regression, the conventional approach to implement DID-IV designs, yields a negative estimate. By contrast, our estimation method indicates a substantial gain from schooling.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Bias-robust causal inference for panel data

We develop a bias-robust framework for causal inference in panel data models with interactive fixed effects. Conventional imputation-based estimators of average treatment effects on the treated do not explicitly account for counterfactual approximation error, potentially leading to misleading inference. Building on bias-aware minimax methods, we construct an estimator that corrects imputed counterfactuals using weighted untreated residuals and delivers confidence intervals with an explicit allowance for the remaining approximation bias. The resulting framework separates protection against approximation bias from the efficiency gains obtained through optimal correction. In simulations, the correction reduces confidence interval length by approximately 13\% relative to bias-aware inference without correction, while preserving empirical coverage. An application to Election Day Registration demonstrates how the correction strengthens the robustness of substantive conclusions to counterfactual error. The proposed approach provides a transparent sensitivity analysis for causal effects when the accuracy of counterfactual imputation cannot be established from observed data alone.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Cordon Tolls and Urban Traffic Volumes: Evidence from NYC's 2025 Congestion Relief Zone

On January 5, 2025, New York City became the first U.S. city to operate a permanent cordon-based congestion toll, charging vehicles entering Manhattan's Central Business District (the Congestion Relief Zone, or CRZ). This study estimates the short-run causal effect of the toll on hourly traffic volumes using a two-way fixed-effects difference in-differences (TWFE-DiD) strategy that compares treated CRZ street segments to untreated Manhattan segments north of 60th Street. The empirical analysis exploits hourly entry counts from the MTA's toll-meter system (4.86 million ten-minute-block records) as the primary descriptive panel and high-frequency NYC DOT Automated Traffic Recorder (ATR) data as the within-segment identification panel. The headline TWFE-DiD point estimate indicates a 40 to 45 percent reduction in log hourly volume at treated CRZ locations, with the effect direction consistent across nine pre-registered alternative specifications and concentrated in peak hours. East River bridges in the balanced panel exhibit a statistically significant 25 percent post-period increase in volume, consistent with route substitution.

econ.EM↗