Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.33744

Estimating Stability of Individual-Specific Predictions from AI-based prediction models using Bootstrap and Cross-validation Resampling

Abstract

Clinical prediction models are typically developed in a single finite dataset, which is one of many possible datasets that could have been collected. Applying the same model development procedure in another sample will provide different predictions for an individual. The degree to which an individual's prediction varies across development sets is referred to as prediction instability and is not captured by average performance measures. Resampling of the training data offers a practical way to assess instability, but its ability to do so accurately and reliably for different model choices is unclear. In a simulation study, we considered non-parametric, parametric, and out-of-bag bootstrap methods and repeated 10-, 5-, and 2-fold cross-validation (CV) to estimate metrics of prediction instability for Elastic Net logistic regression and Random Forest. The same metrics estimated in independent development samples provided the reference. We assessed individual-level prediction variance, empirical 95% range width, and mean absolute differences from the original prediction and true outcome probability. Instability increased in smaller development samples, was greater for Random Forest, and varied across the probability range. Repeated 5- and 10-fold CV underestimated prediction instability across scenarios. Default non-parametric bootstrap more closely approximated independent sampling for Elastic Net but often overestimated instability for Random Forest, as did parametric bootstrap. Out-of-bag bootstrap and repeated 2-fold CV generally agreed most closely with independent sampling, although no procedure was uniformly best. Resampling procedures should not be used interchangeably, nor should less variable predictions be taken as evidence of greater stability. To estimate prediction instability, prefer procedures that predict on held-out data and limit overlap between training resamples.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alex Carriero, Martijn L. G. van Dam, Anne A. H. de Hond, Richard D. Riley, Gary S. Collins, Karel G. M. Moons, Maarten van Smeden, Nicole S. Erler. 2026-10-24. Estimating Stability of Individual-Specific Predictions from AI-based prediction models using Bootstrap and Cross-validation Resampling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33744

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Denoising Data with Measurement Error Using a Reproducing Kernel-Based Diffusion Model

Recent advancements in measurement technologies have facilitated the acquisition of high-resolution data in fields such as engineering, biology, and medicine. However, these observations are frequently corrupted by measurement noise. To address this challenge, we propose a denoising framework that employs diffusion models to recover the underlying error-free data distribution, thereby enabling reliable downstream analysis. Central to our framework is a novel Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS)-based method that trains the diffusion model using only error-contaminated data. This method admits a closed-form solution and achieves a fast convergence rate in terms of estimation error. Theoretically, we validate our approach by deriving an upper bound on the total variation distance between the distributions of the generated denoised data and the true error-free data. Extensive simulations demonstrate the superior empirical performance of our method compared to state-of-the-art baselines. Finally, we illustrate the framework's practical utility in digital health and epidemiology by applying it to Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) data and the association analysis between blood lipids and coronary heart disease.

stat.ME↗

Two-stage least squares with treatment-covariate interactions for treatment effect heterogeneity

Treatment effect heterogeneity with respect to covariates is common in instrumental variable (IV) analyses. An intuitive approach, which we call the interacted two-stage least squares (2sls), is to regress the outcome on the treatment, covariates, and treatment-covariate interactions, using the IV, covariates, and IV-covariate interactions as instruments. We clarify the causal interpretation of the interacted 2sls under the local average treatment effect (LATE) framework when the IV is valid conditional on the covariates. Our main findings are twofold. First, we show that the coefficients on the treatment-covariate interactions from the interacted 2sls identify treatment effect heterogeneity with respect to covariates among compliers for any outcome-generating process if and only if the product of the IV propensity score and the covariates is linear in the covariates, a requirement we call the linear IV-covariate interactions condition. Second, when the covariate vector has dimension K and includes a constant term, we show that the linear IV-covariate interactions condition requires the IV propensity score to take at most K distinct values. The condition holds when (a) the covariates take exactly K distinct values, or (b) the IV is randomly assigned independently of the covariates, but is restrictive beyond these cases. These results underscore the difficulty of interpreting regression coefficients from specifications with treatment-covariate interactions when the covariates are not saturated and the IV is not unconditionally randomized, absent correct specification of the outcome model. We then connect these results to the literature on LATE estimation, and show that under the linear IV-covariate interactions condition, the interacted 2sls with covariates demeaned by their complier means recovers the LATE as a single coefficient.

stat.ME↗

Sliding-Window Signatures as Features for Time Series Forecasting

The evolution of a time series is often influenced not only by its past values but also by external covariates, giving rise to forecasting with exogenous variables. Nonlinear and delayed effects between covariates and the target series make this task particularly challenging. We propose a forecasting framework based on Ridge regression with sliding-window signature features, combining the computational efficiency of (semi-)parametric models with the flexibility of nonparametric approaches. These features capture complex dependencies between the target and the exogenous variables without relying on prior assumptions about the form of these relationships or the influence of past observations. We establish theoretical guarantees in the discrete-time setting, including universality of approximation and stationarity for the sliding-window transform. To ease implementation, we introduce a novel sequential algorithm that exploits window overlap for efficient signature updates. The method is evaluated on both synthetic and real electricity demand data. Results show that signature features effectively encode temporal and nonlinear dependencies, yielding accurate forecasts competitive with those based on expert knowledge and recent neural network approaches.

stat.ME↗