Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.41360

Defining Page-Centric Visual Document Retrieval and Evaluating Existing Benchmarks

Abstract

In modern information retrieval (IR), documents are increasingly encountered as structured sequences of visually rich, paginated units, rather than as flat text. Example documents encountered in our daily life include Word files, PDFs, and slide decks. Free text-centric retrieval systems either ignore this structure entirely or destroy it through arbitrary passage chunking. In this paper, we formulate page-centric Visual Document Retrieval (VDR) with pages as the fundamental indexing units and document context available for assessing page relevance. The formulation distinguishes two retrieval granularities, page and document, and three retrieval paradigms: independent-item, evidence-set, and iterative retrieval. We then assess 42 benchmarks using eight criteria covering corpus characteristics, query construction, relevance annotation, and ranking support. Our analysis shows two main findings on current VDR research. First, evaluation remains concentrated on page-level independent-item retrieval, with fewer resources supporting document-level, evidence-set, and iterative settings. Second, queries originating from real user information needs independently of target corpus content and graded relevance judgments are uncommon, while the coverage and verification of relevance judgments vary substantially. Both findings reveal gaps between the capabilities applications require and those existing evaluation protocols can establish. We provide benchmark selection guidance and identify priorities for future benchmark design, emphasizing alignment between task requirements, relevance semantics, and evaluation protocols.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chongzhi Zhang, Yuqi Zuo, Aixin Sun. 2026-10-30. Defining Page-Centric Visual Document Retrieval and Evaluating Existing Benchmarks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41360

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

DAT: Dynamic Alpha Tuning for Hybrid Retrieval in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Hybrid retrieval techniques in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems enhance information retrieval by combining dense and sparse (e.g., BM25-based) retrieval methods. However, existing approaches struggle with adaptability, as fixed weighting schemes fail to adjust to different queries. To address this, we propose DAT (Dynamic Alpha Tuning), a novel hybrid retrieval framework that dynamically balances dense retrieval and BM25 for each query. DAT leverages a large language model (LLM) to evaluate the effectiveness of the top-1 results from both retrieval methods, assigning an effectiveness score to each. It then calibrates the optimal weighting factor through effectiveness score normalization, ensuring a more adaptive and query-aware weighting between the two approaches. Empirical results show that DAT consistently significantly outperforms fixed-weighting hybrid retrieval methods across various evaluation metrics. Even on smaller models, DAT delivers strong performance, highlighting its efficiency and adaptability.

cs.IR↗

Explaining Group Recommendations via Counterfactuals

Group recommender systems help users make collective choices but often lack transparency, leaving group members uncertain about why items are suggested. Existing explanation methods focus on individuals, offering limited support for groups where multiple preferences interact. In this work, we introduce and formalize the problem of finding counterfactual explanations for group recommendations. We introduce a comprehensive set of item- and explanation-level metrics that capture different aspects, such as relevance, popularity, explanation utility, interpretability, and fairness. We design five algorithms that employ techniques such as search-space pruning, greedy selection, early stopping, and incremental refinement to reduce computational cost and the number of recommender calls while producing high-quality explanations. The algorithms consider different trade-offs; for example, some prioritize computational efficiency at the expense of explanation quality, while others focus on improving explanation quality at a higher computational cost. Experiments on real-world datasets analyze these trade-offs in terms of explanation size, computational cost, utility, and fairness.

cs.IR↗

MuonRec: Shifting the Optimizer Paradigm Beyond Adam in Scalable Generative Recommendation

Recommender systems (RecSys) are increasingly emphasizing scaling, leveraging larger architectures and more interaction data to improve personalization. Yet, despite the optimizer's pivotal role in training, modern RecSys pipelines almost universally default to Adam/AdamW, with limited scrutiny of whether these choices are truly optimal for recommendation. In this work, we revisit optimizer design for scalable recommendation and introduce MuonRec, the first framework that brings the recently proposed Muon optimizer to RecSys training. Muon performs orthogonalized momentum updates for 2D weight matrices via Newton-Schulz iteration, promoting diverse update directions and improving optimization efficiency. We develop an open-source training recipe for recommendation models and evaluate it across both traditional sequential recommenders and modern generative recommenders. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MuonRec reduces converged training steps by an average of 32.4\% while simultaneously improving final ranking quality. Specifically, MuonRec yields consistent relative gains in NDCG@10, averaging 12.6\% across all settings, with particularly pronounced improvements in generative recommendation models. These results consistently outperform strong Adam/AdamW baselines, positioning Muon as a promising new optimizer standard for RecSys training. Our code is available.

cs.IR↗