Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.41699

"Existential dread": Student and faculty views on the impact of changes in federal science funding to physics research

Meagan Sundstrom·Ian Olivant·Eric Brewe
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Sustained investment in physics research is essential not only for advancing science and technology, but also for training the next generation of scientists, including undergraduate students, graduate students, and postdoctoral researchers. Through their research experiences with faculty advisors, these trainees develop critical skills such as experimental design, data analysis, scientific communication, and collaborative problem-solving. Starting in early 2025, the United States administration introduced changes that affected the funding landscape for physics research: grant funding was slashed, grant review panels were delayed or canceled, and some universities froze hiring and research spending. This study aims to better understand the impacts of these changes to academic physics researchers at different career stages. Using survey responses from physics undergraduate students, graduate students, postdoctoral researchers, and associate professors, we find that most academic researchers perceive the impacts to their research as negative. Some of the most commonly reported impacts include loss of existing research funding, concern about obtaining research funding in the future, and job insecurity. We discuss differences in these impacts across career stages and potential implications for the research training pipeline in physics.

Explore related subjects

physics.ed-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Meagan Sundstrom, Ian Olivant, Eric Brewe. 2026-10-30. "Existential dread": Student and faculty views on the impact of changes in federal science funding to physics research. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41699

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Active Learning with Generative AI in Introductory Physics: A Multi-Institutional Study of the P-A.I.R. Framework

Generative AI tools have become part of how students study physics, yet unstructured use may reduce students' opportunities to work through problems independently. The Physics AI-Replication (P-A.I.R.) framework structures AI use as a four-step cycle: students identify a challenging problem, obtain an AI-generated explanation and solution, request similar practice problems, and solve them independently before reviewing the AI's solutions. We evaluated P-A.I.R. in 11 algebra- and calculus-based introductory physics sections at four U.S. institutions using a common end-of-semester survey. Most students reported improved conceptual understanding (90.9\%) and found the replicated practice problems helpful (97.7\%), and these two ratings were strongly associated ($r_s = 0.58$). Perceptions of both components, as well as post-engagement confidence ($μ= 7.18$ on a 1-10 scale), were consistent across institutions. Post-engagement confidence was associated with perceived improvement in conceptual understanding ($r_s = 0.37$) and the helpfulness of replicated practice ($r_s = 0.35$), but not with how often students used AI ($r_s = 0.02$) or with self-reported GPA ($r_s = 0.13$). Thematic analysis of open-ended responses showed that students valued AI primarily for conceptual clarification and structured problem solving (63.0\%), while their main concerns were AI accuracy (34.2\%) and the need for explanations that guide rather than simply provide answers (29.7\%). These findings suggest that how students engage with AI matters more than how often they use it, and that frameworks sequencing AI assistance with independent problem solving offer a practical, transferable approach for physics instruction.

physics.ed-ph↗
arXiv2026

Thermal fluctuations and electronic readout using a moving-coil movement

The moving-coil meter provides a simple context in which to model deterministic electromechanical dynamics, thermal fluctuations, and electronic readout. The movement is a linear electromechanical system in which electrical resistance and intrinsic mechanical damping act as two independent dissipative channels, each accompanied by thermal fluctuations. The stored energy provides a Lyapunov function for stability, and the algebraic Lyapunov equation yields the stationary covariance in closed form. The result exhibits equipartition among the energy terms; damping is shown to reshape the temporal memory of the fluctuations without changing their steady-state variance, giving a thermal floor of a few picoamperes for a representative movement. Exact stochastic integration reproduces the stationary covariance and autocorrelation structure; the covariance is also recovered by spectral integration. Embedding the movement in an active current-drive readout shifts attention to the noise of the complete readout, which a design-stage estimate expresses as a few parts per million of full scale, growing as the input sensitivity increases. The example illustrates that measurement sensitivity and resolution cannot be considered independently. The treatment is aimed at master's-level students in physics with some background in statistical physics and stochastic processes, and basic familiarity with analog electronics.

physics.ed-ph↗
arXiv2026

Combining heavy-tailed keystroke dynamics with eye tracking reveals temporal flexibility in human problem solving

Human problem solving unfolds through complex temporal dynamics that reflect the coordination of perception, cognition, and action. The fine structure of this process is still not very well understood. We use high resolution keystroke logging combined with synchronized eye tracking to examine the micro-temporal structure of human problem solving during written solution construction. Looking at 131,718 inter-keystroke intervals, we find heavy-tailed timing patterns spanning multiple orders of magnitude within the observed range. A three-component Gaussian mixture summarizes overlapping short, intermediate, and long pause ranges. Triangulation with gaze data reveals a systematic shift of attention toward external representations with increasing pause duration. Associations between tail exponents and performance differ across tasks. A larger across-task range of tail exponents ($α_{\mathrm{range}}$) is positively associated with overall performance after adjusting for prior knowledge and measured process covariates ($β= 0.351$, $p_{\mathrm{HC3}} = 0.0165$), accounting for an additional 11.3 percentage points of explained variance in this sample. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that successful reasoning involves adaptive reconfiguration of temporal organization across task demands. The heavy-tailed timing dynamics represent a signature of task dependent cognitive organisation and highlight the potential of keystroke data as an unobtrusive and scalable window into the process of problem solving.

physics.ed-ph↗