Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2611.02424

Around the Clock. New Twists on Fitch Cheney's Five-Card Trick

Doron Levy·Yaakov Malinovsky
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Fitch Cheney's five-card trick is one of the purest two-person effects in card magic, and it has attracted mathematicians for more than seventy five years. This article retells the effect and its classic method, surveys how far it can be pushed, and presents several new results that matter to performers. We give a version of Cheney's method that needs no fixed first suit and no fixed ``lowest card'': shifting every card one step in rank and one step in suit shifts the display in the same way. A heckler who may swap two neighboring cards of the display defeats every method with a full deck. We show that a 29-card deck is the largest for which such a swap can be corrected, and that the corresponding maximum is 14 cards if any two cards may be swapped. We give simple methods that achieve both bounds. Finally, we make Berlekamp's arithmetic method for the 124-card deck independent of where the numbering starts. We also describe a pocket version with eight cards.

Explore related subjects

math.HOmath.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Doron Levy, Yaakov Malinovsky. 2026-11-02. Around the Clock. New Twists on Fitch Cheney's Five-Card Trick. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02424

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Wandering Must Continue: Pure Mathematicians as Rangers of the North

Pure mathematics is an honest barometer of a civilization's scientific capacity, maintaining an unwritten culture of rigor, structural perception, and intellectual honesty whose primary service is not merely proving theorems, but cultivating human judgment. In an era of automated theorem generation and formal verification, this essay argues that establishing a result and understanding both why it holds and why it matters remain distinct achievements, and outlines concrete institutional mechanisms to protect the exploratory core of the discipline.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

It is time for a New Deal for mathematics

The AI labs' vision is based on extraction (of data, wealth, and political power). Mathematicians must oppose it, moving past personal reflections and towards reforming mathematics' social contract.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

Balancing non-rectangular tables

Balancing square and rectangular tables by rotation has been an interesting way to illustrate the intermediate value theorem. This article studies the same question for tables whose feet form a cyclic quadrilateral, following a conjecture of A.~Martin. In the idealised model behind this conjecture, the balancing act works for every such table and is a nice application of the ergodic theorem. For the actual rigid table on a Lipschitz terrain, the situation is more subtle. If the terrain is flattened enough, the table can be stabilised unless an idealised wobbling function vanishes identically, \ie unless the terrain is degenerate for the table. Even if this should happen, the tables whose feet are vertices of a regular polygon and which satisfy a non-degeneracy condition of their own can still be stabilised on every terrain with a small enough Lipschitz constant (\eg a halved regular hexagon as long as the slope is less than $3.7$\textdegree{}). On the other hand, there is an isosceles trapezoid and another table, which are shown to wobble at every angle on suitable terrains however small the Lipschitz constant is. These counterexamples are fragile: for every table, if the idealised wobbling function vanishes identically for every position of the rotation axis in a small disc, then, near the feet, the terrain is a plane or a paraboloid of revolution with a vertical axis; so in practice a slight move of the axis makes the terrain non-degenerate. The results are, with minor exceptions, formalised in Lean.

math.HO↗