Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.03561

Studentized inference in randomized experiments when a few units dominate the outcome variation

Abstract

In completely randomized experiments with heavy-tailed outcomes, a few units can carry a share of the residual variation that does not vanish as the number of units grows. We study the studentized difference in means and Lin's regression-adjusted estimator, with covariates whose leverage vanishes, when the finite population is fixed, and the treatment assignment is the only source of randomness. The studentized statistic then has a nonnormal limit in general. Populations with the same marginal distributions of potential outcomes can have different limits, as the limit depends on the unobserved pairing mechanism of the two potential outcomes of each dominant unit. When the outcome errors are drawn from a heavy-tailed law, the limit is random and, outside a degenerate case, varies with the population. Under balanced allocation, the conventional Wald interval has an explicit asymptotic coverage floor. At the nominal level $0.95$, the floor is about $0.42$ for every population and about $0.84$ when the two potential residuals of each unit are equal. Both floors are close to the best possible, and without balanced allocation, the coverage can fall to the smaller of the proportions of treated and control units.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xinyuan Chen, Jonathan W. Kiesel, Jonathan R. Woody. 2026-11-02. Studentized inference in randomized experiments when a few units dominate the outcome variation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03561

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Gaussian Approximation for High-Dimensional Weighted and Two-Sample $U$-statistics with Size-Dependent Kernels

We develop Gaussian approximations for high-dimensional vectors formed by second-order $U$-and $V$-statistics whose kernels depend on sample size. To accommodate weighted and two-sample $U$-and $V$-statistics within a unified framework, we establish our results under independent but not identically distributed (i.n.i.d.) sampling. The resulting theorems apply to a broad range of problems, including estimation in linear regression models with many covariates or many-weak instruments, variance component analysis, smoothed two-sample testing, and inference for separately exchangeable arrays, among others. Our results do not require either component of the Hoeffding decomposition to dominate, thereby covering both non-degenerate and degenerate regimes. In addition, we develop maximal inequalities for high-dimensional $U$-statistics with size-dependent kernels under the i.n.i.d.~setting, in a form that remains sharp across a broad range of applications, which may be of independent interest. Finally, applications to estimation and testing with many weak instrumental variables demonstrate that, our results are sharp enough to recover the corresponding fixed-dimensional rate conditions up to logarithmic factors.

math.ST↗

Asymmetric conformal prediction with penalized kernel sum-of-squares

Conformal prediction (CP) is a distribution-free method to construct reliable prediction intervals that has gained significant attention in recent years. Despite its success and various proposed extensions, a significant practical feature which has been overlooked in previous research is the potential skewed nature of the noise, or of the residuals when the predictive model exhibits bias. In this work, we leverage recent developments in CP to propose a new asymmetric procedure that bridges the gap between skewed and non-skewed noise distributions, while still maintaining adaptivity of the prediction intervals. We introduce a new statistical learning problem to construct adaptive and asymmetric prediction bands, with a unique feature based on a penalty which promotes symmetry: when its intensity varies, the intervals smoothly change from symmetric to asymmetric ones. This learning problem is based on reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces and the recently introduced kernel sum-of-squares framework. First, we establish representer theorems to make our problem tractable in practice, and derive dual formulations which are essential for scalability to larger datasets. Second, the intensity of the penalty is chosen using a novel data-driven method which automatically identifies the symmetric nature of the noise. We show that consenting to some asymmetry can let the learned prediction bands better adapt to small sample regimes or biased predictive models.

math.ST↗

The Pivotal Information Criterion

The Bayesian and Akaike information criteria aim at finding a good balance between under- and over-fitting. They are extensively used every day by practitioners. Yet we contend they suffer from at least two afflictions: their penalty parameters $λ=\log n$ and $λ=2$ are too small, leading to many false discoveries, and their inherent (best subset) discrete optimization is infeasible in high dimension. We alleviate these issues with the pivotal information criterion: PIC is defined as a continuous optimization problem, and the PIC penalty parameter $λ$ is selected at the detection boundary (under pure noise). PIC's choice of $λ$ is an upper quantile of a statistic that we prove to be (asymptotically) pivotal, provided the loss function is appropriately transformed. As a result, simulations show a phase transition in the probability of exact support recovery with PIC, a phenomenon studied with no noise in compressed sensing. Applied to real data, for similar predictive performances, PIC selects the least complex model among state-of-the-art learners.

math.ST↗