Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.04604

Sparse-View 3D Coronary Reconstruction from Vessel Segmentations Using a Diffusion Prior

Abstract

Reconstructing three-dimensional (3D) coronary anatomy from sparse angiographic views could support percutaneous coronary intervention, but limited angular coverage and imperfect vessel segmentations introduce substantial geometric ambiguity. We propose a vessel-specific reconstruction framework combining a learned 3D diffusion prior, visual-hull initialization, and projection-based data consistency. The unconditional diffusion model is trained on coronary vessel masks without paired 2D--3D data and reused across different view counts without retraining. During inference, a scaled visual hull initializes reconstruction, while projection-based updates constrain diffusion refinement using patient-specific vessel observations. We evaluated the framework on simulated angiograms derived from ImageCAS computed tomography angiography volumes using two, four, and eight views at two contrast levels. Across 50 evaluation coronary-tree cases, the proposed method achieved higher mean Dice and clDice than visual hull, deep image prior (DIP), and hash-grid implicit neural representation (INR) at all view counts under reduced contrast. With eight views, improvements over DIP, the best-performing baseline at lower contrast, were approximately 0.13 in Dice and 0.22 in clDice. At higher contrast, performance remained competitive with hash-grid INR, the best-performing eight-view baseline. The preferred diffusion starting timestep depended on observation quality and view count, with excessive refinement reducing accuracy at higher contrast. Projection guidance improved both metrics across all conditions. Averaging stochastic reconstructions further improved accuracy, while sample disagreement localized errors with average-precision gains of 0.14--0.21 over error prevalence. These findings support diffusion-prior reconstruction from sparse vessel observations, although clinical validation remains necessary.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tianyuan Wang, Kenan Niu, Stefano Stramigioli. 2026-11-03. Sparse-View 3D Coronary Reconstruction from Vessel Segmentations Using a Diffusion Prior. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04604

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Cyst-X: A Multicenter MRI Benchmark for Pancreatic Cyst Risk Stratification and Cross-Institutional AI

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are pancreatic cancer precursors, and guideline-based risk stratification both over-treats indolent lesions and misses progression. We present Cyst-X, a public benchmark of 1,461 T1-weighted (T1W) and T2-weighted (T2W) MRI volumes from 764 patients at seven centers, with expert pancreas masks, risk labels, splits and reference AI risk-prediction models. PanSegNet segmented the pancreas with Dice of 86.34% (T1W) and 89.26% (T2W) on held-out centers. For the primary task, high-risk versus low-risk IPMN, a 3D DenseNet-121 achieved cross-validated AUCs of 74.59% and 73.45%; complementary broad binary and three-class tasks reached 78.67--81.28% and 73.47--75.76%. Because patient images often cannot be pooled across institutions, we also simulated federated learning across the seven centers. On T2W MRI, FedProx was similar to centralized training in center-averaged external AUC (71.00% versus 71.18%) but not in pooled AUC (62.35% versus 77.49%). Radiologist comparisons showed cohort-dependent sensitivity--specificity tradeoffs. Cyst-X supports reproducible method development and identifies within-IPMN risk discrimination and cross-center score comparability as open challenges.

eess.IV↗

Beyond Visibility: Real-Time Surface Accessibility Fields from Sparse LiDAR

Understanding which surfaces a given tool can physically access is fundamental to robotic interaction, yet 3D perception typically stops at geometric reconstruction or visibility estimation. Visibility does not imply accessibility: a visible point may still be blocked by tool geometry or approach-corridor clearance. We propose the Accessibility Field: a per-point surface accessibility labelling, computed from streaming sparse LiDAR and updated at sensor rate as the platform moves. Our GPU-based method evaluates surface points against precomputed tool-geometry kernels across rotated approach orientations, underpinned by a scan-centric TSDF integration scheme suited to non-repetitive sensors such as the Livox Mid-360. The system is tool-agnostic, requires no prior scene model, and runs in real time on both workstation and Jetson Orin edge hardware. On synthetic primitives, our method achieves F1=90.8%, against 69.8% for a Hidden Point Removal baseline; ablations within our own pipeline give 81.5% replacing the TSDF query with a point-cloud collision check, and 33.9% replacing scan-centric integration with projective, nvblox-style integration. On a mature synthetic Pinus radiata model, the method labels 56.8% of visible pine branch surfaces as physically inaccessible.

eess.IV↗

Forecasting Brain Tracer Distribution from Pre-Contrast MRI: A Comparison of Direct Regression and Flow Matching

The brain fluid clearance system can be studied with intrathecal contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). By injecting a tracer into the spinal canal and performing MRI over 24--48\,h, one can measure how a tracer injected into the cerebrospinal fluid spreads through the brain. As this is an invasive procedure requiring several MRI scans, we ask how much of the later tracer distribution can be predicted from the pre-contrast scan and elapsed time alone. Using 104 training patients (878 MRI volumes), we compared a direct image-to-image regression model with a more complex generative model based on conditional flow matching, and tested both on 23 held-out patients and on 51 patients from a separate cohort with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Relative to simply copying the pre-contrast scan, the direct model reduced the mean absolute error (intensities normalized to $[0,1]$) from 0.089 to 0.036, about 60\%, in held-out patients and from 0.075 to 0.056, about 25\%, in the iNPH cohort. The reduction held in every sampled elapsed-time interval and brain compartment, and errors remained largest at 20--30\,h and in the ventricles, where enhancement is strongest. Its predicted change maps agreed with the observed tracer enhancement rather than only reproducing anatomy. The generative model was less accurate in both cohorts. A substantial part of the later tracer distribution is therefore predictable from the patient's brain anatomy as seen on pre-contrast MRI, and the added model complexity gave no benefit at this data scale. Whether this accuracy suffices for a given clinical use remains to be established; with prospective validation, such forecasts could help simplify the MRI protocol used to assess brain clearance.

eess.IV↗