Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.04889

NP-Hardness and a PTAS for Maximum Interval Multicover, with Applications to Dense Subgraphs

Abstract

Given intervals and points on a line, each point with a demand, and a budget $K$, Maximum Interval Multicover asks for at most $K$ intervals that satisfy as many points as possible, a point being satisfied if it lies in at least as many chosen intervals as its demand. One application is committee elections in which each candidate is approved by consecutive voters and voters have individual demands. Xu, Ran and Zhang introduced the problem and gave a $1/2$-approximation; the objective is not submodular when demands exceed one. Li, Tu, Zhang and Cao gave a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for the minimization counterpart, unweighted partial interval multicover, and asked for its complexity. We prove that both problems are NP-hard, even for intervals of equal length; as their optima are integers bounded by the input size, neither has a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$. We then give a PTAS for Maximum Interval Multicover, also for arbitrary nonnegative nondecreasing rewards for the coverage of each point. Building on a decomposition from Nonner's PTAS for Densest $k$-Subgraph on interval graphs, our scheme cuts the line into pieces at a small loss and solves every piece exactly. The key dynamic program handles intervals crossing a common point by choosing an interleaving of their left and right endpoints rather than sweeping along the line; it needs only two counters to track these intervals. The same algorithm yields PTASes on convex bipartite graphs for Bipartite Dense Subgraph, improving on the ratio $2/3$ of Backer and Keil for the subclass of bipartite permutation graphs, and on interval graphs for Maximum $k$-Vertex Cover and weighted clique counts.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Morteza Alimi, Tobias Mömke, Alexandru Popa, Michael Ruderer. 2026-11-03. NP-Hardness and a PTAS for Maximum Interval Multicover, with Applications to Dense Subgraphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04889

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Loop unrolling of UCA models: distance labeling

A proper circular-arc (PCA) model is a pair $M = (C, A)$ where $C$ is a circle and $A$ is a family of inclusion-free arcs on $C$ whose extremes are pairwise different. The model $M$ represents a digraph $D$ that has one vertex $v(a)$ for each $a \in A$ and one edge $v(a) \to v(b)$ for each pair of arcs $a,b \in A(M)$ such that the beginning point of $b$ belongs to $a$. For $k \geq 0$, the $k$-th power $D^k$ of $D$ has the same vertices as $D$ and $v(a) \to v(b)$ is an edge of $D^k$ when $a\neq b$ and the distance from $v(a)$ to $v(b)$ in $D$ is at most $k$. A unit circular-arc (UCA) model is a PCA model $U = (C,A)$ in which all the arcs have the same length $\ell+1$. If $\ell$, the length $c$ of $C$, and the extremes of the arcs of $A$ are integer, then $U$ is a $(c,\ell)$-CA model. For $i \geq 0$, the model $i \times U$ of $U$ is obtained by replacing each arc $(s,s+\ell+1)$ with the arc $(s,s+i\ell+1)$. If $U$ represents a digraph $D$, then $U$ is $k$-multiplicative when $i \times U$ represents $D^i$ for every $0 \leq i \leq k$. In this article we design a linear time algorithm to decide if a PCA model $M$ is equivalent to a $k$-multiplicative UCA model when $k$ is given as input. The algorithm either outputs a $k$-multiplicative UCA model $U$ equivalent to $M$ or a negative certificate that can be authenticated in linear time. Our main technical tool is a new characterization of those PCA models that are equivalent to $k$-multiplicative UCA models. For $k=1$, this characterization yields a new algorithm for the classical representation problem that is simpler than the previously known algorithms.

cs.DS↗

Improved Algorithms for Unrelated Crowd Worker Scheduling in Mobile Social Networks

This paper studies task scheduling with unrelated crowd workers in mobile social networks, where the service time of a task depends on the crowd worker that performs it, and the objective is to minimize the total weighted completion time. For identical crowd workers, we tighten the approximation ratio of the Largest-Ratio-First (LRF) algorithm and update the competitive ratio of its online version. For unrelated crowd workers, we show that the time-indexed rounding framework of Im and Li remains valid when worker-dependent contact delays are added, which yields a randomized algorithm with an expected approximation ratio of 1.45; this improves upon the expected ratio of $1.5+ε$ obtained in our previous work for identical crowd workers. We also derandomize this algorithm. To improve computational efficiency, we further propose an algorithm that exploits the optimality of the Smith-ratio order on a single crowd worker, and we prove that it is a deterministic 1.5-approximation algorithm and that its polynomial-time version achieves an approximation ratio arbitrarily close to 1.5. Experiments on synthetic instances and on instances derived from real contact traces show that this algorithm outperforms three variants of LRF in all tested settings, with the largest advantage when the crowd workers are highly heterogeneous, performs on par with a local-search heuristic for unrelated machines, and is within 0.4\% of the optimum on average on small instances that can be solved exactly.

cs.DS↗

Fully Scalable MPC Algorithms for Euclidean Clustering: Constant Approximation in Constant Rounds

We study Euclidean $k$-Means and $k$-Median under the Massively Parallel Computation (MPC) model, focusing on the \emph{fully scalable} setting. Previously, fully scalable algorithms for $k$-Means and/or $k$-Median either required $O(\log\log n\cdot\log\log\log n)$ rounds [Cohen-Addad, Kuhn, and Parsaeian; SODA'26] or guaranteed only an $O(\log n)$-approximation [Goranci, Jiang, Kiss, Kong, Qian, and Szilagyi; SODA'26]. In this paper, we close this gap by giving the first fully scalable algorithms for both problems, which work even when $k$ is polynomially larger than the local memory, and \emph{simultaneously} achieve an $O(1)$-approximation and $O(1)$ round complexity. Technically, we devise a new variant of the MP algorithm [Mettu and Plaxton, SICOMP'03] that computes a \emph{fractional solution satisfying the Lagrangian Multiplier Preserving (LMP) property}. Importantly, this LMP guarantee holds even under arbitrary distance distortions, a feature that is crucial for efficient MPC implementations. We then give a novel MPC rounding algorithm that first rounds to a bicriteria solution with $k+O(n^{1-ε})$ centers and then uses an \emph{iterative kernelization} idea to convert it into one with exactly $k$ centers.

cs.DS↗