Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.05006

When Category Means Move: A Paired-Support Audit of Recommendation Logs with Random Insertions

Abstract

Content-category dashboards summarize production recommendation logs, although the serving policy selects the users, items, and contexts behind each mean. Using KuaiRand random-insertion impressions, we audit these summaries on the same 12,472 users and 5,486 videos in both logs. Standard means have absolute/centered mean absolute error (MAE) 0.1935/0.0491 and rank correlation 0.7833. User demeaning plus a random grand-mean anchor reduces absolute MAE by 80.0%, but centered MAE by only 21.0%, without reliably improving rank. A complete-support ledger allocates weighted squared error mainly to within-video residual (72.41%) and video mix (23.90%), with 3.65% from random support. In a frozen later test, early category calibration reaches MAE 0.0251 versus 0.0531 for scalar calibration; their direct difference is -0.0280 [-0.0296, -0.0172]. Decision evidence is cutoff-specific: the nominal top-10 regret change for row-weighted demeaning versus naive is -0.0062 [-0.0084, -0.0003], while top-5 and top-20 intervals include zero. The six-contrast family-wise top-10 interval [-0.0136, 0.0013] includes zero. An outcome-free disjoint randomized-reference split also leaves all six nominal contrasts covering zero. A known-truth stress test shows incomplete improvement under a mean-additive positive control and failure under item mix and weak overlap. All decompositions are descriptive and each result is conditional on its overlap cohort. KuaiRand intervals quantify user-cluster variation conditional on the realized catalog and calendar; we claim neither intrinsic category effects nor a universally valid correction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yu Zhang, Zhihan Wang, Yuhang Lu, Shuai Li. 2026-11-03. When Category Means Move: A Paired-Support Audit of Recommendation Logs with Random Insertions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05006

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

DAT: Dynamic Alpha Tuning for Hybrid Retrieval in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Hybrid retrieval techniques in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems enhance information retrieval by combining dense and sparse (e.g., BM25-based) retrieval methods. However, existing approaches struggle with adaptability, as fixed weighting schemes fail to adjust to different queries. To address this, we propose DAT (Dynamic Alpha Tuning), a novel hybrid retrieval framework that dynamically balances dense retrieval and BM25 for each query. DAT leverages a large language model (LLM) to evaluate the effectiveness of the top-1 results from both retrieval methods, assigning an effectiveness score to each. It then calibrates the optimal weighting factor through effectiveness score normalization, ensuring a more adaptive and query-aware weighting between the two approaches. Empirical results show that DAT consistently significantly outperforms fixed-weighting hybrid retrieval methods across various evaluation metrics. Even on smaller models, DAT delivers strong performance, highlighting its efficiency and adaptability.

cs.IR↗

Explaining Group Recommendations via Counterfactuals

Group recommender systems help users make collective choices but often lack transparency, leaving group members uncertain about why items are suggested. Existing explanation methods focus on individuals, offering limited support for groups where multiple preferences interact. In this work, we introduce and formalize the problem of finding counterfactual explanations for group recommendations. We introduce a comprehensive set of item- and explanation-level metrics that capture different aspects, such as relevance, popularity, explanation utility, interpretability, and fairness. We design five algorithms that employ techniques such as search-space pruning, greedy selection, early stopping, and incremental refinement to reduce computational cost and the number of recommender calls while producing high-quality explanations. The algorithms consider different trade-offs; for example, some prioritize computational efficiency at the expense of explanation quality, while others focus on improving explanation quality at a higher computational cost. Experiments on real-world datasets analyze these trade-offs in terms of explanation size, computational cost, utility, and fairness.

cs.IR↗

MuonRec: Shifting the Optimizer Paradigm Beyond Adam in Scalable Generative Recommendation

Recommender systems (RecSys) are increasingly emphasizing scaling, leveraging larger architectures and more interaction data to improve personalization. Yet, despite the optimizer's pivotal role in training, modern RecSys pipelines almost universally default to Adam/AdamW, with limited scrutiny of whether these choices are truly optimal for recommendation. In this work, we revisit optimizer design for scalable recommendation and introduce MuonRec, the first framework that brings the recently proposed Muon optimizer to RecSys training. Muon performs orthogonalized momentum updates for 2D weight matrices via Newton-Schulz iteration, promoting diverse update directions and improving optimization efficiency. We develop an open-source training recipe for recommendation models and evaluate it across both traditional sequential recommenders and modern generative recommenders. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MuonRec reduces converged training steps by an average of 32.4\% while simultaneously improving final ranking quality. Specifically, MuonRec yields consistent relative gains in NDCG@10, averaging 12.6\% across all settings, with particularly pronounced improvements in generative recommendation models. These results consistently outperform strong Adam/AdamW baselines, positioning Muon as a promising new optimizer standard for RecSys training. Our code is available.

cs.IR↗