Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.05134

Sharp Bounds for Truthful-in-Expectation Scheduling

Abstract

We study randomized mechanisms for scheduling indivisible jobs on $n$ unrelated machines. Each machine is controlled by a selfish agent who privately knows its processing time for each job. A mechanism assigns every job to a machine and makes payments. We require truthfulness in expectation: no agent can increase its expected payment minus its expected processing cost by misreporting, regardless of the other agents' reports. The makespan is the maximum total processing time assigned to a machine; the objective is to minimize its expectation. We prove that the optimal approximation ratio is $(n+1)/2$ for every $n\ge7$, relative to the minimum makespan of an integral assignment. The lower bound holds for every $n$ and allows unrestricted computation and arbitrary correlations among assignments, assuming finite expected payments and a guarantee uniform over all finite job counts. The matching mechanism uses correlated rounding and runs in expected polynomial bit time on rational inputs. These guarantees hold for all finite nonnegative processing times. For two machines, we characterize the optimal approximation ratio exactly as an analytic constant, approximately $1.505995705434$, and give a mechanism attaining it. For three machines the optimal ratio is $2$. For four, five, and six machines we obtain upper bounds of $3$, $105/32$, and $29/8$, respectively, compared with the general lower bound $(n+1)/2$. The proofs for $n\ge7$ do not rely on computer-assisted certificates; the two- and three-machine results use exact rational computer-assisted certificates.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yunpeng Li. 2026-11-03. Sharp Bounds for Truthful-in-Expectation Scheduling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05134

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Project Submission Games in Participatory Budgeting

We introduce the framework of project submission games, capturing the behavior of project proposers in participatory budgeting (and multiwinner elections). Here, each proposer submits a subset of project proposals, aiming at maximizing the total cost of those that get funded. We focus on finding conditions under which pure Nash equilibria (NE) exist in our games, and on the complexity of checking whether they exist. We also seek algorithms for computing best responses for the proposers

cs.GT↗

Domination-Avoiding Learning Agents Cannot Collude

An influential paper of Calvano et al. empirically demonstrated that Q-learning agents spontaneously collude when placed as sellers that compete on prices in a natural market model. More recent results of Fish et al. empirically demonstrated that similar collusion happens with commercial LLMs. We formally prove that such collusion can also happen with external-regret-minimizing agents. We identify a very general class of agents, which we term Domination-Avoiding agents, that provably do not collude in such markets. This class contains all Mean-Based agents and all internal-regret-minimizing agents, as well as others such as Multiplicative-Weight agents with variable learning rate and contextual variants thereof. More generally we show that, in any game, this class of agents is guaranteed to jointly learn to almost never play strategies that are eliminated by repeated elimination of purely dominated strategies.

cs.GT↗

Settling the Complexity of Hylland--Zeckhauser Equilibria

The Hylland--Zeckhauser (HZ) mechanism is a foundational framework for allocating indivisible goods in one-sided matching markets via lotteries supported by competitive prices and equal artificial budgets. We resolve the exact computational complexity of the HZ scheme by proving that computing an exact HZ equilibrium is FIXP-complete, thereby settling a conjecture of Vazirani and Yannakakis. Notably, this hardness persists even when computing the equilibrium allocation alone. We establish our hardness result via a reduction that encodes quadratic fixed-point equations into a reciprocal variational inequality. On the algorithmic side, we present a deterministic polynomial-time approximation algorithm that achieves an additive error of $0.0755211 + δ$ for any $δ> 0$, significantly improving upon the previous $1/e$ guarantee.

cs.GT↗