Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.07969

Estimating Vertical Ocean Velocity from Horizontal Currents: Linear and Depth-Conditional Neural-Network Approaches on a High-Resolution Regional Ocean Model

Abstract

The vertical component of the ocean velocity, w, is several orders of magnitude smaller than the horizontal components u and v, yet it controls vertical tracer transport, upwelling, and mixed-layer ventilation. Because w is extremely difficult to measure directly and is normally obtained only diagnostically from the continuity equation, predicting it from the horizontal velocity field is a problem of both practical and physical interest. We address this problem with two data-driven methods, a physically-motivated linear baseline and a convolutional neural network conditioned on depth through Feature-wise Linear Modulation (FiLM). Both methods are applied to a high-resolution regional simulation of the Coastal and Regional Ocean Community model over the Western Mediterranean, using a sub-region of the south-west Mediterranean Sea as a training region and two independent, out-of-sample regions for validation: the Alboran Sea, with a distinct dynamical regime driven by Atlantic inflow through the Strait of Gibraltar, and a transition region between Almería and Cartagena, between the Alboran Sea and the open western Mediterranean. Once the FiLM network is regularized enough to avoid overfitting to a single training domain, we find that its comparison with the physically interpretable linear baseline is domain- and depth-dependent rather than uniform: near the reference depth, essentially all of the achievable out-of-sample performance on both validation domains is already captured by the linear model, but at the deepest levels tested the FiLM network outperforms the linear baseline on the transition domain, whereas on Alboran it does not.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Francesco M. Ventrella, Cristóbal López, Emilio Hernandez-Garcia. 2026-11-05. Estimating Vertical Ocean Velocity from Horizontal Currents: Linear and Depth-Conditional Neural-Network Approaches on a High-Resolution Regional Ocean Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07969

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Land-Sea Contrast Pattern in Surface Temperature and Atmospheric Circulation Trends in Recent Decades

We argue land-sea contrast is an important driver of spatial patterns of observed surface temperature and atmospheric circulation trends, including the negative Inter-Decadal Pacific Oscillation (IPO)-like tendency across the Pacific basin. Observed and modeled trends display an overall decline in sea level pressure over the faster-warming land, with a spatial pattern that resembles the seasonal cycle and modeled response to land heating. Coupled historical forcing climate model simulations underestimate the land-sea warming ratio. It is only in the early response of abrupt CO2 quadrupling climate model simulations that climate models are able to recreate the observed land-sea warming ratio, in which case a negative IPO-like sea level pressure trend and surface warming pattern over the Pacific comparable to observed trends are seen. We propose that some discrepancies between observed trends and those predicted by climate models are explained by the underestimation of the land-sea warming ratio by climate models.

physics.ao-ph↗

Distinguishing Initial-Condition and Model Error Using Machine-Learning Weather Models

Differentiable weather models allow atmospheric initial conditions to be directly optimized to shadow a known trajectory, which we take from a reanalysis dataset. Here, we extend this optimization to include the forecast model, GraphCast, using low-rank adaptation (LoRA). We compare model optimization with initial-condition (IC) optimization, and then joint optimization, where both are tuned simultaneously. When compared against a control forecast initialized with reanalysis data, LoRA and IC optimization individually produce similar improvements. We find similar results when IC and LoRA are jointly optimized across a spectrum of solutions where a tuning coefficient smoothly shifts the weight of the joint optimization from all-LoRA to all-IC; forecast improvement is not unique to the relative contributions of model and IC corrections. To better discriminate the source of error, we introduce a second model, Pangu-Weather, as a supervisor that gates IC updates during joint optimization. This gated optimization is the same as before, except that IC updates at each epoch are accepted only when they improve the forecasts of both models; otherwise, only the LoRA update is accepted. Results show that this cross-model constraint substantially improves agreement between the two models in their response to the same optimized ICs, narrowing the gap in mean forecast error reduction from 64% to 10%. Moreover, when used together, the LoRA and IC corrections from the gated optimization yield GraphCast forecast improvements similar to those from the ungated optimization. These results imply that model error that is encoded in the ungated ICs is shifted to the LoRA corrections via gating, yielding IC corrections that may provide better analysis estimates.

physics.ao-ph↗

Estimating ensemble-mean anomaly correlations and the ratio of predictable components using an unbiased estimate of the predictable signal variance

The correlation ($r$) between ensemble mean forecasts and observations is a frequently-used metric of forecast quality in the weather and climate prediction communities. However, uncorrected estimates of $r$ are biased towards zero at finite ensemble size due to the influence of unpredictable noise that contaminates the sample ensemble mean. This note summarises established ensemble-size adjustment methods and characterises the behaviour of $r_{\infty}$, a correlation estimator that is constructed from an unbiased and ensemble-size-independent estimate of the signal variance. The only requirement is that forecast members are exchangeable with one another such that they can be interpreted as independent draws from a case-specific predictive distribution. The estimator $r_{\infty}$ does not require forecasts and observations to be statistically exchangeable, only that the unpredictable component of each member is uncorrelated with the observed truth, and thus works for both reliable and unreliable forecasts. In some situations, $r_{\infty}$ may be undefined (i.e. the estimated signal variance is negative) or fall outside the admissible range $-1 \leq r_{\infty} \leq 1$ when the predictable signal is small relative to the sampling uncertainty. These inadmissible values can be interpreted as evidence that the true predictable signal cannot be resolved with the available ensemble size and number of cases. The same unbiased signal variance can also be used to estimate the correlation between the predictable signal and individual members to yield an ensemble-size-invariant estimator of the ratio of predictable components (RPC). In contrast, variance-based RPC estimates, including forms that correct only the model predictable component, are biased low by a factor that depends only on the ensemble size and model signal-to-noise ratio.

physics.ao-ph↗