Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.08173

Regret Bounds for Profit Maximization in Bilateral Trade: Learning the Best Posted-Price Mechanism

Abstract

Bilateral trade models the task of intermediating between two strategic agents, a seller and a buyer, willing to trade a good for which they hold private valuations. We study this problem from the perspective of a profit-maximizing broker in a regret minimization framework. At each time step, a new seller and buyer arrive and the broker proposes a trading price to each agent. The trade happens if both agents accept, and the profit of the broker is the difference between the price received from the buyer and the one paid to the seller. At the end of each interaction, the learner only observes whether the trade occurred, and its goal is to achieve sublinear regret relative to the best fixed pair of prices in hindsight. We start by investigating the adversarial version of the problem, where buyer and seller valuations are generated by an adversary. In this setting, we construct a polynomial-time learning algorithm with a $\tilde O(T^{\frac 23})$ regret rate, which is nearly tight even if the valuations are drawn i.i.d. from independent distributions, thus matching the rate for one-sided pricing. Our adversarial algorithm combines a localized estimation procedure with an information-based minimax construction. We then consider valuations drawn i.i.d. from independent distributions satisfying the monotone-hazard-rate (MHR) property and provide a learning algorithm with nearly tight $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret. The algorithm combines localized estimation with a stochastic convex bandit routine applied to the negative logarithm of expected profit. Finally, we complement this result by showing a separation between MHR and regular distributions, proving that the minimax regret rate in the latter setting is $\tilde Θ(T^{\frac 35})$. This last result contrasts with the $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret bound that can be obtained for one-sided pricing with regular distributions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Johannes Brüstle, Simone Di Gregorio, Federico Fusco, Stefano Leonardi. 2026-11-05. Regret Bounds for Profit Maximization in Bilateral Trade: Learning the Best Posted-Price Mechanism. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08173

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Infinite lexicographic products of positional objectives

This paper contributes to the study of positional determinacy of infinite duration games played on potentially infinite graphs with neutral transitions. Recently, [Ohlmann, TheoretiCS 2023] established that positionality of prefix-independent objectives is preserved by finite lexicographic products. We propose two different notions of infinite lexicographic products indexed by arbitrary ordinals, and extend Ohlmann's result by proving that they also preserve positionality. In the context of one-player positionality, this extends positional determinacy results of [Grädel and Walukiewicz, Logical Methods in Computer Science 2006] to edge-labelled games and arbitrarily many priorities for both Max-Parity and Min-Parity. Moreover, we show that the Max-Parity objectives over countable ordinals are complete for the infinite levels of the difference hierarchy over $Σ^0_2$ and that Min-Parity is complete for the class $Σ^0_3$. We obtain therefore positional languages that are complete for all those levels, as well as new insights about closure under unions and neutral letters.

cs.GT↗

Effective Horizons for Prophet Inequalities with Discounted I.I.D. Rewards

We study prophet inequalities for $n$ i.i.d. base rewards subject to multiplicative discounts across $S$ phases. For equal-length phases and a common discount factor $\widetildeγ$, we characterize the optimal competitive ratio of single-quantile policies as $n\to\infty$ with $S$ and $\widetildeγ$ fixed. The resulting sharp guarantee describes the dependence on the phase parameters: it recovers $1-1/e$ without discounting and approaches $1/2$ in the worst-case regime. We also establish a distribution-free comparison that bounds the discounted prophet by a fractional i.i.d. maximum with effective horizon $B$, the sum of the discount weights across all observations. The comparison yields acceptance probability $1/B$, determined only by the phase profile. This calibration attains the canonical optimum even among single-quantile policies that may choose their acceptance probability using the known base distribution. The comparison also gives guarantees for heterogeneous discounts and unequal phase lengths. A complementary optimal-stopping upper bound establishes the same limiting optimum of $1/2$ for arbitrary stopping rules in the canonical model. Finally, the same effective-horizon calibration sets acceptance probability $1-\widetildeγ$ under infinite-horizon geometric discounting. This explicit quantile rule attains Boshuizen's (1994) known optimal worst-case ratio $1/(1+\widetildeγ)$ without solving a Bellman equation.

cs.GT↗

Fair Selection of Generalized Nash Equilibria: A Comparability Perspective

Generalized Nash equilibrium (GNE) problems model self-interested agents coupled through their costs and shared constraints, and arise throughout control applications that allocate a scarce common resource. Such problems typically admit a continuum of equilibria, so any implementation must \emph{select} one. This selection is not neutral: it decides how the cost of the shared constraint is distributed among the agents, a decision often expected to be fair. The variational GNE (v-GNE), which charges all agents a uniform shadow price, is the conventional choice and is frequently advocated as fair. Through the lens of \emph{comparability} from social choice theory, we show that the GNE set itself requires no inter-agent comparability of costs, whereas the v-GNE implicitly assumes cardinal unit comparability, one of the stronger notions. We then introduce the fair GNE (f-GNE), which selects an equilibrium by explicitly optimizing a fairness metric matched to the comparability at hand, and give constructive routes to compute it for single-constraint and linear-quadratic games. An electric-vehicle charging game serves as a running example throughout this self-contained tutorial.

cs.GT↗