Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.08718

Memory-Aware Multi-Agent Architecture with LLM-based Orchestration for Conversational Recommendation

Abstract

Conversational recommender systems often treat user sessions in isolation, limiting their ability to capture how user intent evolves over time. While large language models (LLMs) have improved semantic understanding, they are typically used as isolated components, without addressing how memory, retrieval, and decision-making should be integrated at the system level. In this work, we propose a memory-aware multi-agent architecture for conversational recommendation, in which LLMs act as orchestration layers that coordinate intent refinement, query construction, and interaction flow. A key design principle is the integration of long-term memory as a first-class component, influencing both routing decisions and semantic query formation. We evaluate the system through cross-session memory experiments, multi-turn conversational simulations, and supervisor-driven interaction studies on the Amazon Reviews dataset. Results show that memory-enabled interactions recover up to 63\% of the gap toward explicit-query scenarios and prevent semantic degradation in extended dialogues. In addition, supervisory orchestration increases user acceptance by +28.9 percentage points, highlighting the importance of structured orchestration in guiding interaction and output quality. We also observe an exposure bottleneck between retrieved candidates and displayed recommendations. While LLM-reranking does not improve Hit@K, it consistently enhances semantic consistency and diversity. To capture these effects, we introduce the Semantic Consistency Score (SCS), a complementary evaluation measure. Overall, the results emphasize the importance of system-level design choices, suggesting that effective conversational recommendation benefits from explicit memory integration, orchestration, and evaluation beyond traditional ranking metrics.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Emilly Pitman de Castro, Vanessa Silva, Gustavo Kanno, Marcus Santos, Bruno Ferraz do Amaral, Marcelo Nogueira, Lucas Francisco Pellicer, Lucas Lanaro, Pedro Augusto Luiz, João Renato Ribeiro Manesco, Giovanni Carbinatti, Isabela de Lima Santos, Lucas Oliveira Jeronymo, Jeison Fappi, Raul Rotilli Aguirre, Fabio André Frantz, Renata De Paris, Fabiana Marucci, Lohan Silva, Vinicius Diniz Reolon, Wandemberg Gibaut. 2026-11-05. Memory-Aware Multi-Agent Architecture with LLM-based Orchestration for Conversational Recommendation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-39892-5_25

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Limit Analysis for Symbolic Multi-step Reasoning Tasks with Information Propagation Rules Based on Transformers

Transformers are able to perform reasoning tasks, however the intrinsic mechanism remains widely open. In this paper we propose a set of information propagation rules based on Transformers and utilize symbolic reasoning tasks to theoretically analyze the limit reasoning steps. We show that the limit number of reasoning steps is between $2^{L-1}-1$ and $\frac{3^{L-1}-1}{2}$ for a model with $L$ attention layers in a single-pass. In addition, we find that, for problems with a fixed number of reasoning steps, Transformers exhibit a preference for generating sequences that satisfy certain ordering relations. Ultimately, we construct a Transformer and prove that the limiting reasoning depth is achievable.

cs.AI↗

Counterfactual Distillation: Internalizing Reflective Experience into LLM Agent

Large language models increasingly act as autonomous agents in long-horizon interactions, learning from final outcomes and environmental feedback. However, optimizing from such interaction experience remains challenging, as feedback is heterogeneous and rarely carries explicit reward information. Existing post-training approaches rely on outcome-driven methods, such as reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), which primarily exploit final success signals while leaving interaction experience and feedback underutilized. In sparse-reward, long-horizon tasks, this often results in distribution sharpening: the policy reinforces a narrow set of already-successful behaviors, without substantially improving the feedback-grounded agency needed for broader problem-solving capacity (e.g., Pass@k). We propose Counterfactual Distillation, a framework that converts exploration-derived experience into trainable policy supervision. Specifically, we organize exploration as a tree-structured search process, where the agent reflects on past decision points and makes new experience-guided decisions to form alternative branches. These corrections are then distilled as counterfactual targets: we train the model to predict the revised action from the original history without explicitly providing the experience, thereby introducing out-of-distribution behavior patterns and expanding exploration capacity. Across diverse interactive coding and agentic tasks, our method outperforms outcome-driven baselines such as GRPO and experience-based methods such as Early Experience, with gains of up to 14 percentage points over the base model on Pass@128. When interleaved with reinforcement learning updates, it further raises the performance ceiling, improving Pass@1 on Sokoban by 8 percentage points over extended GRPO. Our code is available at https://github.com/motigrez/Counterfactual-Distillation.

cs.AI↗

Taming the Centaur(s) with LAPITHS: a framework for a theoretically grounded interpretation of AI performances

We introduce a framework called LAPITHS (Language model Analysis through Paradigm grounded Interpretations of Theses about Human likenesS) and use it to show that several major claims advanced by models such as CENTAUR, proposed as an artificial Unified Model of Cognition, are not theoretically or empirically justified. LAPITHS provides a principled reference point for counteracting the current behaviouristic tendency in AI research to interpret the human level performances of transformer based language models as evidence of human like underlying computation and, by extension, as signs of cognitive abilities. The novelty of LAPITHS lies in making explicit the arguments grounded in two quantitative assessments: (i) the Minimal Cognitive Grid, a theoretically motivated method for estimating the cognitive plausibility of artificial systems, and (ii) a behavioural comparison showing that results similar to those reported for CENTAUR like models can be reproduced by other systems that do not satisfy the structural constraints typically associated with cognitive plausibility, and whose outputs do not provide independent explanatory insight into human cognition.

cs.AI↗