Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.08843

Bayesian Unit-level Quantile Modeling with Application to Wealth Data

Abstract

Modeling wealth quantiles over time and space and across fine-grained demographic classifications is of vital importance to policy makers. However, such data present unique challenges for standard small area estimation methodologies because they are highly skewed and heavy-tailed with both positive and negative values. Traditional area-level modeling and design-based approaches struggle to capture these features. Meanwhile, existing unit-level methodology frequently treats the survey design as ignorable and does not apply to surveys that are repeated over time. Often the analysis is restricted to alternative response variables that are non-negative, such as poverty indicators or income. To overcome these limitations, we propose a Bayesian, asymmetric Laplace pseudolikelihood model that is able to capture the major features of wealth while adjusting for survey weights and accounting for both spatial and temporal dependence. We present a Gibbs sampling algorithm for our model, as well as a variational Bayes algorithm for fast computation. We apply the method to the Survey of Income and Program Participation to characterize geographic, temporal, and demographic variation in the distribution of U.S. household wealth, including for sparsely sampled domains where direct estimates are unavailable or unstable.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daniel Vedensky, Paul A. Parker, Scott H. Holan. 2026-11-06. Bayesian Unit-level Quantile Modeling with Application to Wealth Data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08843

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Optimal Forecast Reconciliation with Uncertainty Quantification

We propose to estimate the weight matrix used for forecast reconciliation as parameters in a general linear model in order to quantify its uncertainty. This implies that forecast reconciliation can be formulated as an orthogonal projection from the space of base-forecast errors into a coherent linear subspace. We use variance decomposition together with the Wishart distribution to derive the central estimator for the forecast-error covariance matrix. In addition, we prove that distance-reducing properties apply to the reconciled forecasts at all levels of the hierarchy as well as to the forecast-error covariance. A covariance matrix for the reconciliation weight matrix is derived, which leads to improved estimates of the forecast-error covariance matrix. We show how shrinkage can be introduced in the formulated model by imposing specific priors on the weight matrix and the forecast-error covariance matrix. The method is illustrated in a simulation study that shows consistent improvements in the log-score. Finally, standard errors for the weight matrix and the variance-separation formula are illustrated using a case study of forecasting electricity load in Sweden.

stat.ME↗

postcard: An R Package for Marginal Effect Estimation with or without Prognostic Score Adjustment

Covariate adjustment is a widely used technique in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for improving the efficiency of treatment effect estimators. By adjusting for predictive baseline covariates, variance can be reduced, enhancing statistical precision and study power. Rosenblum and van der Laan [2010] use the framework of generalized linear models (GLMs) in a plug-in analysis to show efficiency gains using covariate adjustment for marginal effect estimation. Recently the use of prognostic scores as adjustment covariates has gained popularity. Schuler et al. [2022] introduce and validate the method for continuous endpoints using linear models. Building on this work Højbjerre-Frandsen et al. [2025] extends the method proposed by Schuler et al. [2022] to be used in combination with the GLM plug-in procedure [Rosenblum and van der Laan, 2010]. This method achieves semi-parametric efficiency under assumptions of additive treatment effects on the link scale. Additionally, Højbjerre-Frandsen et al. [2025] provide a formula for power approximation which is valid even under model misspecification, enabling realistic sample size estimation. This article introduces an R package, which implements the GLM plug-in method with or without PrOgnoSTic CovARiate aDjustment, postcard. The package has two core features: (1) estimating marginal effects and the variance hereof (with or without prognostic adjustment) and (2) approximating statistical power. Functionalities also include integration of the Discrete Super Learner for constructing prognostic scores and simulation capabilities for exploring the methods in practice. Through examples and simulations, we demonstrate postcard as a practical toolkit for statisticians.

stat.ME↗

Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation for a Genuinely Unbalanced Dynamic Network Panel Data Model

This paper develops quasi-maximum likelihood estimation for genuinely unbalanced dynamic network panel data models. We first study a baseline one-way fixed effect specification and then extend the framework to two-way fixed effects. The model accommodates contemporaneous and lagged network spillovers, temporal dependence, and a listing effect that operates when a unit first appears in the panel. For the baseline specification, we establish consistency and asymptotic normality of the QMLE, characterize the incidental-parameter bias, and propose a bias-corrected estimator. We further provide a consistent estimator of the asymptotic covariance matrix, to enable feasible inference. Under the two-way fixed effect extension, we derive the corresponding asymptotic distribution, bias correction, and covariance matrix estimator, accounting for the additional bias component induced by the time fixed effects. Monte Carlo simulations examine the finite sample performance of the proposed estimators and inference procedure. An empirical application to Airbnb listings from New Zealand and New York City reveals region-specific patterns in spatial and temporal price transmission, highlighting the importance of modeling genuine unbalancedness in dynamic network settings.

stat.ME↗