Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.08853

Synchronized Optimal Transport Reconstructs Coupled Transcriptomic and Chromatin Dynamics

Abstract

Single-cell RNA and ATAC data collected across developmental stages provide time-course snapshots of transcriptional and regulatory states. Since sequencing is destructive, trajectories between these snapshots must be inferred from independently sampled cell populations. Existing approaches typically infer continuous dynamics in a single modality or integrate RNA and ATAC in a shared representation. Here we present Cross-Omics Aligned Trajectory Inference (COATI), which extends unbalanced synchronized dynamical optimal transport to time-dependent cross-modal maps for reconstructing coupled trajectories in distinct RNA and ATAC state spaces. We evaluated COATI on synthetic benchmarks and four developmental datasets using held-out-stage reconstruction and lineage analyses. COATI improved reconstruction of cell populations at held-out stages, including recovery of chromatin-state heterogeneity within cell types, and better preserved developmental lineage relationships. The unbalanced formulation allows the inference of population mass changes, which were shown to associate with DNA-replication programs at early stages and lineage-maturation programs later in development. The coupled trajectories enabled analysis of lineage-specific transcriptional and chromatin changes and their temporal relationships during development. Lineage responses inferred by COATI agreed with independent CRISPR perturbation results, and the inferred regulatory patterns were consistent with independent epigenetic data.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jingfeng Wang, Yanxiang Zhao, Qing Nie, Zixuan Cang. 2026-11-06. Synchronized Optimal Transport Reconstructs Coupled Transcriptomic and Chromatin Dynamics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08853

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Genome-Factory: A Library for Tuning, Deploying, and Interpreting Genomic Foundation Models

We introduce Genome-Factory, the first integrated Python library for tuning, deploying, and interpreting genomic foundation models. Our core contribution is to simplify and unify the workflow for genomic model development: data collection, model tuning, inference, benchmarking, and interpretability. For data collection, Genome-Factory offers an automated pipeline to download genomic sequences and preprocess them. For model tuning, Genome-Factory supports both full and parameter-efficient fine-tuning across diverse genomic models. For inference, Genome-Factory enables both embedding extraction and DNA sequence generation. For benchmarking, we include two existing benchmarks and provide a flexible interface to incorporate additional benchmarks. For interpretability, Genome-Factory introduces an open-source biological interpreter based on a sparse auto-encoder. We validate the utility of Genome-Factory across three dimensions: (i) Compatibility with diverse models and fine-tuning methods; (ii) Benchmarking downstream performance using two open-source benchmarks; (iii) Biological interpretation of learned representations with DNABERT-2. These results highlight its practical value for real-world genomic analysis. GitHub: https://github.com/WeiminWu2000/Genome_Factory.

q-bio.GN↗

One Method Does Not Fit All: A Large-Scale Benchmark of Imputation Methods for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) enables gene expression profiling at cellular resolution but is inherently affected by sparsity caused by dropout events, where expressed genes are recorded as zeros due to technical limitations. These dropout events distort gene expression distributions and compromise downstream analyses. To address this challenge, numerous traditional and deep learning (DL)-based imputation methods have been developed to detect dropout events and impute their true expression values. However, evaluations of these methods have largely been restricted to specific downstream tasks and limited datasets, and large-scale systematic comparisons under standardized benchmarking conditions are lacking. To fill this gap, we present a comprehensive framework that evaluates 16 imputation methods across 10 experimental protocols, 6 downstream tasks, and 30 benchmark datasets. Through extensive experimentation, we systematically investigate the strengths, limitations, and task-specific performance of these methods under consistent evaluation settings. Our results show that traditional methods perform relatively better across a wide range of downstream tasks, whereas DL-based methods are more variable. In addition, strong performance in numerical gene expression recovery does not necessarily translate into improved biological interpretability in downstream analyses, including cell clustering, differential expression analysis, marker gene analysis, trajectory analysis, and cell type annotation. Furthermore, performance varies substantially across datasets, protocols, and downstream analyses, with no single method consistently outperforming the others. Our findings provide practical guidance for selecting imputation methods tailored to specific analytical objectives and underscore the importance of task-specific evaluation in scRNA-seq data analysis.

q-bio.GN↗

Thalamus-Reasoning: A Multimodal Large Language Model for Multi-Sample Omics Reasoning

Large language models can reason over biological knowledge, but they are not naturally equipped to work with quantitative omics measurements. Existing approaches either convert expression profiles into long textual representations, often losing quantitative information, or connect omics encoders to language models for narrow tasks. We introduce Thalamus-Reasoning, a 9B multimodal language model that represents each bulk or single-cell transcriptome as a compact continuous embedding that can be interleaved with natural-language instructions and with other samples in the same context. A key contribution is a training corpus that connects experimental measurements with biological knowledge and task supervision. We combine templates linking transcriptomic profiles to annotations and experimental outcomes, reasoning examples connecting evidence across sources, and LLM-generated supervision with task-specific quality checks. The instruction-tuning corpus spans 157 biological and general-purpose task groups. Training includes continued pretraining on 20 billion tokens and supervised fine-tuning on 5.21 million conversations. We further introduce GEO-OmicsQA, a publication-disjoint benchmark of 3,000 questions requiring models to interpret and compare expression profiles from real GEO studies. Thalamus-Reasoning achieves the best results among the evaluated models on three of four held-out annotation tasks and on all six GEO-OmicsQA variants, and the best average performance among compared methods on PerturbQA perturbation-response prediction. Ablations show a clear advantage for continuous omics representations over a text-only gene-list representation. These results show that quantitative transcriptomic measurements and biological language can be integrated within a general conversational model, enabling both predictive tasks and language-guided interpretation of experimental samples.

q-bio.GN↗