SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · alg-geom/9505027

Determinant of Period Integral

Abstract

Period integrals arise from the comparison between Betti cohomologies and de Rham cohomologies. In this paper, we give a formula for the determinant of period integrals in terms of the canonical pairing between Picard group of rank 1 realizations and relative Chow group. It is compatible with the similar formula for Galois modules proved by the first author, and as a consequence, under the assumption of Gersten resolution, the determinant of the cohomology of a determinantally motivic object is motivic.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Takeshi Saito, Tomohide Terasoma. 1995-05-26. Determinant of Period Integral. https://arxiv.org/abs/alg-geom/9505027

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Classification of Varieties with Canonical Curve Section via Gaussian maps on Canonical Curves

Let $C \subset P^{g-1}$ be a smooth canonical curve of genus $g \geq 3$. The purpose of this article is to further develop a method to classify varieties having $C$ as their curve section, using Gaussian map computations. In a previous article a careful analysis of the degeneration to the cone over the hyperplane section was made for _prime_ Fano threefolds, that is Fano threefolds whose Picard group is generated by the hyperplane bundle. In this article we extend this method and classify Fano threefolds of higher index (which still have Picard number one). We are also able to classify Mukai varieties, i.e. varieties of dimension four or more with canonical curve sections.

alg-geom

Boundedness and $K^2$ for log surfaces

Let $ε, C$ be two positive real numbers, and $\mathcal C \subset \mathbb R$ be a DCC (descending chain condition) set. Let $(X, B = \sum b_j B_j)$ denote a projective surface with an $\mathbb R$-divisor. Then (1) The class $\{X\}$ of surfaces for which there exists a divisor $B$ such that $(X,B)$ is $ε$-log terminal and $-(K_X + B)$ is nef (excluding only those for which at the same time $K_X\equiv 0$, $B=0$, and $X$ has at worst Du Val singularities), is bounded. (2) The set $\{(K_X + B)^2\}$ of squares for the semi log canonical pairs $(X, B)$ with ample $K_X + B$ and $b_j \in \mathcal C$, is a DCC set. (3) The class $\{(X,B)\}$ of pairs such that $(X, B)$ is semi log canonical, $K_X + B$ is ample, $(K_X + B)^2 = C$ and $b_j \in \mathcal C$, is bounded.

alg-geom