arXiv · astro-ph/0007122
Comment on "On physical interpretation of the Poynting-Robertson effect"
Abstract
In response to the comments of astro-ph/0006426 on Srikanth (Icarus 1999), we clarify, and thereby justify, the definition of Poynting-Robertson drag adopted in the latter. We confirm that dust absorption is a necessary condition while re-emission is neither necessary nor sufficient for the inspiralling of a rest-isotropically emitting dust.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R. Srikanth. 2000-07-11. Comment on "On physical interpretation of the Poynting-Robertson effect". https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0007122
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.