arXiv · astro-ph/0610177
GRB Radiative Efficiencies Derived from the Swift Data: GRBs vs. XRFs, Long vs. Short
Abstract
We systematically analyze the prompt emission and the early afterglow data of a sample of 31 GRBs detected by {\em Swift} before September 2005, and estimate the GRB radiative efficiency. BAT's narrow band inhibits a precise determination of the GRB spectral parameters, and we have developed a method to estimate these parameters with the hardness ratio information. The shallow decay component commonly existing in early X-ray afterglows, if interpreted as continuous energy injection in the external shock, suggests that the GRB efficiency previously derived from the late-time X-ray data were not reliable. We calculate two radiative efficiencies using the afterglow kinetic energy E_K derived at the putative deceleration time t_{dec}) and at the break time (t_b) when the energy injection phase ends, respectively. At t_b XRFs appear to be less efficient than normal GRBs. However, when we analyze the data at t_{dec} XRFs are found to be as efficient as GRBs. Short GRBs have similar radiative efficiencies to long GRBs despite of their different progenitors. Twenty-two bursts in the sample are identified to have the afterglow cooling frequency below the X-ray band. Assuming ε_e = 0.1, we find η_γ(t_b) usually <10% and η_γ(t_{dec}) varying from a few percents to > 90%. Nine GRBs in the sample have the afterglow cooling frequency above the X-ray band for a very long time. This suggests a very small ε_B and/or a very low ambient density n.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Bing Zhang, Enwei Liang, Kim L. Page, Dirk Grupe, Bin-Bin Zhang, Scott D. Barthelmy, David N. Burrows, Sergio Campana, Guido Chincarini, Neil Gehrels, Shiho Kobayashi, Peter Meszaros, Alberto Moretti, John A. Nousek, Paul T. O'Brien, Julian P. Osborne, Peter W. A. Roming, Takanori Sakamoto, Patricia Schady, Richard Willingale. 2006-10-05. GRB Radiative Efficiencies Derived from the Swift Data: GRBs vs. XRFs, Long vs. Short. https://doi.org/10.1086/510110
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.