The UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey First Data Release

S. J. Warren; N. C. Hambly; S. Dye; O. Almaini; N. J. G. Cross; A. C. Edge; S. Foucaud; P. C. Hewett; S. T. Hodgkin; M. J. Irwin; R. F. Jameson; A. Lawrence; P. W. Lucas; A. J. Adamson; R. M. Bandyopadhyay; J. Bryant; R. S. Collins; C. J. Davis; J. S. Dunlop; J. P. Emerson; D. W. Evans; E. A. Gonzales-Solares; P. Hirst; M. J. Jarvis; T. R. Kendall; T. H. Kerr; S. K. Leggett; J. R. Lewis; R. G. Mann; R. J. McLure; R. G. McMahon; D. J. Mortlock; M. G. Rawlings; M. A. Read; M. Riello; C. Simpson; D. J. B. Smith; E. T. W. Sutorius; T. A. Targett; W. P. Varricatt

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11284.x

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · astro-ph/0610191

The UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey First Data Release

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The First Data Release (DR1) of the UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS) took place on 2006 July 21. UKIDSS is a set of five large near-infrared surveys, covering a complementary range of areas, depths, and Galactic latitudes. DR1 is the first large release of survey-quality data from UKIDSS and includes 320 sq degs of multicolour data to (Vega) K=18, complete (depending on the survey) in three to five bands from the set ZYJHK, together with 4 sq degs of deep JK data to an average depth K=21. In addition the release includes a similar quantity of data with incomplete filter coverage. In JHK, in regions of low extinction, the photometric uniformity of the calibration is better than 0.02 mag. in each band. The accuracy of the calibration in ZY remains to be quantified, and the same is true of JHK in regions of high extinction. The median image FWHM across the dataset is 0.82 arcsec. We describe changes since the Early Data Release in the implementation, pipeline and calibration, quality control, and archive procedures. We provide maps of the areas surveyed, and summarise the contents of each of the five surveys in terms of filters, areas, and depths. DR1 marks completion of 7 per cent of the UKIDSS 7-year goals.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

S. J. Warren, N. C. Hambly, S. Dye, O. Almaini, N. J. G. Cross, A. C. Edge, S. Foucaud, P. C. Hewett, S. T. Hodgkin, M. J. Irwin, R. F. Jameson, A. Lawrence, P. W. Lucas, A. J. Adamson, R. M. Bandyopadhyay, J. Bryant, R. S. Collins, C. J. Davis, J. S. Dunlop, J. P. Emerson, D. W. Evans, E. A. Gonzales-Solares, P. Hirst, M. J. Jarvis, T. R. Kendall, T. H. Kerr, S. K. Leggett, J. R. Lewis, R. G. Mann, R. J. McLure, R. G. McMahon, D. J. Mortlock, M. G. Rawlings, M. A. Read, M. Riello, C. Simpson, D. J. B. Smith, E. T. W. Sutorius, T. A. Targett, W. P. Varricatt. 2007-07-30. The UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey First Data Release. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11284.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Frame covariance of CMBR lensing in the exact 1+3 covariant radiation hierarchy

The exact $1+3$ covariant Boltzmann hierarchy for the cosmic microwave background contains acceleration, shear and vorticity couplings whose coefficients grow linearly in $\ell$. We show that all are the multipole form of the aberration operator in the photon Liouville equation. Under a change of threading, this operator shifts by the along-ray generator of a Lorentz boost. The acceleration coupling of $\ell$ to $\ell\pm1$ and the shear coupling of $\ell$ to $\ell\pm2$ are therefore frame-covariant descriptions of the same operator, related by an algebraic, pointwise relabelling of direction. With emitter and observer frames fixed, the observed sky is independent of the intermediate threading at every $\ell$. We derive this in $1+3$ covariant and gauge-invariant variables without constructing second-order gauge-invariant variables. The $O(ε^2\ell)$ content is gravitational lensing, as known in metric variables. Linearisation about a Friedmann--Lemaître--Robertson--Walker background removes these couplings, requiring lensing to be reinstated from the geodesic equation. Keeping the threading arbitrary makes frame covariance explicit and places observer aberration in the same operator. In the Newtonian threading we compute both halves of the deflection: the equivalence-principle contribution enters through aberration, while the spatial-curvature contribution arises from free streaming on perturbed spatial sections and reduces to the same operator. The lensing efficiency follows from the direction derivative. The angular-power-spectrum contribution is quartic in the potential: for a deflection statistically independent of the source, the two fourth-order terms carrying $\ell^2$ cancel where the spectrum is smooth on the deflection scale, and lensing redistributes power without adding ensemble variance.

astro-ph↗

arXiv2026

Cosmic Conundrums with Quantum Corrections

Darh energy was discovered over 25 years ago and we do not have an explanation of it. Dark matter comprises 95% of matter in the universe and we still don't know what it is. The Webb telescope has been finding fully formed galaxies with massive black holes millions of times the mass of the sun in the early universe and we don't have any explanation. A quantum density limitation will be used to solve these and other outstanding problems.

astro-ph↗

arXiv2026

On binary pulsars and the force of gravity

The energy-momentum budget of the astrophysical systems can be studied by the exact local conservation equation derived by Landau and Lifshitz. We show that a similar equation is valid for the Einstein-Cartan gravity. We reanalyze a binary pulsar system using the Landau-Lifshitz conservation equation and show that the orbital period change rate can be completely understood as a curvature backreaction process. Taking into account the detailed theoretical and observational research of relativistic binary pulsar systems, especially the system of Hulse and Taylor, we conclude that general relativity and astrophysical observations rule out the existence of gravitational radiation. We comment upon the LIGO GW events and their alternative explanation, as well as the recent pulsar timing arrays data.

astro-ph↗