arXiv · astro-ph/0701749
Systematic Uncertainties in Stellar Mass Estimation for Distinct Galaxy Populations
Abstract
We show that different stellar-mass estimation methods yield overall mass scales that disagree by factors up to ~2 for the z=0 galaxy population, and more importantly, relative mass scales that sometimes disagree by factors >~3 between distinct classes of galaxies (spiral/irregular types, classical E/S0s, and E/S0s whose colors reflect recent star formation). This comparison considers stellar mass estimates based on (a) two different calibrations of the correlation between K-band mass-to-light ratio and B-R color (Bell et al., Portinari et al.) and (b) detailed fitting of UBRJHK photometry and optical spectrophotometry using two different population synthesis models (Bruzual-Charlot, Maraston), with the same initial mass function in all cases. We also compare stellar+gas masses with dynamical masses. This analysis offers only weak arguments for preferring a particular stellar-mass estimation method, given the plausibility of real variations in dynamical properties and dark matter content. These results help to calibrate the systematic uncertainties inherent in mass-based evolutionary studies of galaxies, including comparisons of low and high redshift galaxies.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Sheila J. Kannappan, Eric Gawiser. 2007-01-26. Systematic Uncertainties in Stellar Mass Estimation for Distinct Galaxy Populations. https://doi.org/10.1086/512974
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.