arXiv · astro-ph/9507068
Likelihood Analysis of Repeating in the BATSE Catalogue
Abstract
I describe a new likelihood technique, based on counts-in-cells statistics, that I use to analyze repeating in the BATSE 1B and 2B catalogues. Using the 1B data, I find that repeating is preferred over non-repeating by 4.3:1 odds, with a well-defined peak at 5-6 repetitions per source. I find that the post-1B data are consistent with the repeating model inferred from the 1B data, after taking into account the lower fraction of bursts with well-determined positions. Combining the two data sets, I find that the odds favoring repeating over non-repeating are almost unaffected at 4:1, with a narrower peak at 5 repetitions per source. I conclude that the data sets are consistent both with each other and with repeating, and that for these data sets the odds favor repeating.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Jean M. Quashnock. 1995-07-17. Likelihood Analysis of Repeating in the BATSE Catalogue. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00658584
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.