Distance indicators based on the luminosity-profile shapes of early-type galaxies--a reply

Abstract

In a recent paper, Binggeli & Jerjen (1998) question the value of the extra- galactic distance indicators presented by Young & Currie (1994 & 1995) and state that they have refuted `the claim that the Virgo dEs [dwarf-elliptical galaxies]...are distributed in a prolate structure stretching from 8 to 20 Mpc distance (Young & Currie 1995).' even though no such claim was ever made. In this paper, we examine Binggeli & Jerjen's claims that intrinsic scatter rather than spatial depth must be the main cause of the large scatters observed in the relevant scaling relationships for Virgo galaxies. We investigate the accuracy of Binggeli & Jerjen's photometric parameters and find that while their profile curvature and scalelength measurements are probably useful, their total magnitude and central surface-brightness measurements are not useful for the purpose of investigating scaling laws because they suffer from serious systematic and random errors. We also investigate Binggeli & Jerjen's criti- cisms of our (1995) analysis. We demonstrate that their test for strong mutual dependence between distance estimates based on the two different scaling laws is invalid because of its prior assumption of negligible cluster depth. We further demonstrate that the [relative] distance estimates on which their kinematical arguments are based cannot be meaningful, not only because of the seriousness of the photometric errors, but also because they are undermined by the prior assumption that depth effects can again be neglected.