arXiv · cond-mat/0002019
Vortex Lattice Depinning vs. Vortex Lattice Melting: a pinning-based explanation of the equilibrium magnetization jump
Abstract
In this communication we argue that the Vortex Lattice Melting scenario fails to explain several key experimental results published in the literature. From a careful analysis of these results we conclude that the Flux Line Lattice (FLL) does not melt along a material- and sample-dependent boundary $H_j(T)$ but the opposite, it de-couples from the superconducting matrix becoming more ordered. When the FLL depinning is sharp, the difference between the equilibrium magnetization $M_{eq}(T,H)$ of the pinned and unpinned FLL leads to the observed step-like change $ΔM_{eq}(T,H)$. We demonstrate that the experimentally obtained $ΔM_{eq}(T,H)$ can be well accounted for by a variation of the pinning efficiency of vortices along the $H_j(T)$ boundary.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Y. Kopelevich, P. Esquinazi. 2000-02-01. Vortex Lattice Depinning vs. Vortex Lattice Melting: a pinning-based explanation of the equilibrium magnetization jump. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0038-1098(00)00056-9
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.