arXiv · cond-mat/0106006
Reply to Suslov
Abstract
In a recent submission to this archive arXiv:cond-mat/0105325, Suslov has claimed that our recent numerical estimate of the critical exponent of the Anderson transition $ν=1.57\pm.02$ is in error and that the available numerical data are consistent with a value of $ν=1$. We contest this claim and demonstrate using Suslov's own scaling procedure that $ν\ne 1$
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Keith Slevin, Tomi Ohtsuki. 2001-06-01. Reply to Suslov. https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0106006
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.