arXiv · cond-mat/0508452
Reply to the comment by C. Capan and K. Behnia on "Nernst effect in poor conductors and in the cuprate superconductors" (cond-mat/0501288)
Abstract
The comment criticisms (cond-mat/0501288) are completely out of line with the context of the commented theory (Phys. Rev. Lett. v.93, 217002 (2004)). The comment neglected essential parts of the theory, which actually addressed all relevant experimental observations. I argue that the coexistence of the large Nernst signal and the insulating-like in-plane resistivity in underdoped cuprates rules out the vortex scenario, but agrees remarkably well with our theory.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A. S. Alexandrov. 2005-08-19. Reply to the comment by C. Capan and K. Behnia on "Nernst effect in poor conductors and in the cuprate superconductors" (cond-mat/0501288). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.95.259704
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.