arXiv · cond-mat/0608501
Reply to Comment on "Superfluid stability in the BEC-BCS crossover" by Sheehy and Radzihovsky
Abstract
The reason behind the discrepancy between the phase diagrams of our earlier work [1] and the comment of Sheehy and Radzihovsky [2] is discussed. We show that, in contrast to what is claimed in [2], the requirement of positive susceptibility is sufficient to rule out states that are local maximum of the free energy (as a function of the order parameter $Δ$
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C. -H. Pao, S. -T. Wu, S. -K. Yip. 2006-08-23. Reply to Comment on "Superfluid stability in the BEC-BCS crossover" by Sheehy and Radzihovsky. https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0608501
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.