arXiv · cond-mat/9703139
Reply to the Comment on 'Quantum Phase Slips and Transport in Ultra-Thin Superconducting Wires'
Abstract
We reply to the recent Comment [cond-mat/9702231] by J.-M. Duan. Our point of view is markedly different on every issue raised. Much of the disagreement can be traced to a different preception of experimentally relevant length scales. i) We explain the difference between our formulation, which rests on a microscopic basis, and the phenomenological one of the author. ii) Our renormalization scheme is fundamentally right, as the "log(log)" interaction appears only in wires of astronomical lengths. iii) The tunneling barrier is profoundly reduced by the kinetic inductance. iv) We do make an appropriate comparison to the data on the thinnest available wires.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Andrei D. Zaikin, Dmitrii S. Golubev, Anne van Otterlo, Gergely T. Zimányi. 1997-03-13. Reply to the Comment on 'Quantum Phase Slips and Transport in Ultra-Thin Superconducting Wires'. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.78.1552
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.