arXiv · cond-mat/9705191
Response to Greiter's Comment
Abstract
Greiter claimed erroneously that the pi-excitation of the Hubbard model has an energy of the order of U. This mistake originates from a inconsistent treatment of the two particle Hartree energy and the Hartee correction to the chemical potential. In any self-consistent calculations, these two contributions cancel exactly, as shown by Kohn, Luttinger and Ward. We also show that his interpretation of the finite-size studies is inconsistent.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Eugene Demler, Shou-Cheng Zhang, Stefan Meixner, Werner Hanke. 1997-05-21. Response to Greiter's Comment. https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9705191
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.