SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · cs/0012013

Taxation and Valuation

Abstract

I explain the root of persistent failure of efforts to remove tax-induced distortions of economic incentives. It lies in FUNDAMENTAL IMPOSSIBILITY of objectively evaluating tax base. Distortions can be entirely avoided in the sector of publicly traded corporations. Evaluation can be bypassed by taxing it in shares (to be auctioned) rather than cash. Stock capital includes cost basis (B) and unrealized gains (G). Gains are presently tax-deferred until realized in divestment. The deferral is remedied by corporate income tax (rate t). i is the variable interest rate on special constant value "cv-bonds". The proposed system replaces (1) corporate income tax - with interest on the deferred G*t, and (2) divestment taxes - with interest on B*t. To collect both, IRS will periodically take to auction a fraction i*t of privately held publicly traded shares. Note: (2) is a neutral simplification: Investments can be split into B(1-t) stock and B*t in bond portfolios. Bond interest buys back the auctioned shares, and tax-free divestment matches the original yield. The i*t stock tax matches the income tax on cv-bond portfolios of equal value. The Treasury, too, could match its income (in bond sales) to the rate t tax on the full stock market return (without tempting price manipulation). It can vary i to keep the bond volume at a fraction t of market capitalization; then share auctions supply bond interest. Taxpayers, too, could unilaterally match their burden to such tax by keeping a fraction t of capital in bonds. The main feature is: nothing companies and investors do can change their tax (fraction i*t of shares), so business decisions would be exactly the same as without taxes. No longer would taxes on dividends and capital gains impede capital flow, companies would forget bewildering mazes of tax laws, regulations, precedents; Congress would still collect the same revenue it now does.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Leonid A. Levin. 2000-12-18. Taxation and Valuation. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0012013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AI for AI: Optimizing Additional Infrastructure Build-out to Power Artificial Intelligence Data Centers

The twenty-first century's transformative technology, artificial intelligence, is increasingly constrained by the twentieth century's transformative technology, the electricity grid. Rapid growth in electricity demand from data centers is leading to higher electricity prices, without a compensating supply-side response. We develop a framework linking data-center load growth, available generation capacity, and market-clearing prices to understand this phenomenon. We first analyze a deterministic model to show how differing estimates of demand and supply growth rates affect prices. We then model the expansion of new data centers and their associated electricity demand, together with build-outs of new electricity supply, as stochastic processes,resulting in probabilistic distributions of supply, demand, and prices rather than a single forecast. Finally, we formulate generation expansion as a stochastic control problem in which a revenue-maximizing investor dynamically chooses the intensity of supply-side investments. The analysis highlights a central challenge of the data-center build-out: even when rapid demand growth increases the need for new generation, the uncertainties related to load forecasts, development execution risks, and value cannibalization from overbuilding capacity may weaken incentives to invest at the pace required to keep electricity prices stable.

q-fin.GN

Measuring DeFi Risk

Decentralized finance (DeFi) lending has grown from nonexistent in 2017 to nearly 40 billion US Dollars in deposited funds in May 2022. Using cryptocurrency as collateral, the platforms match speculative margin trading with yield-seeking depositors lending coins pegged to the dollar (stable coins). Depositors receive claims guaranteed by a basket of collateral, akin to new stable coins. We develop a framework requiring only knowledge of aggregate deposits and borrowings to measure overall system risks to lenders and borrowers. Using evidence from major protocols, the measures identify an increase in system fragility beyond prudent levels around mid 2021, with a potential loss of peg for extreme variations in coin prices. Overall, the model offers an easily implementable aggregate risk metric capturing the perspectives of synthetic investors and offers early warning signals as the industry is moving from deposits guaranteed by collateral to fiat money.

q-fin.GN

Historical Reflections on Interest Rates and the Emergence of the Yield Curve

This text grew out of a historical introduction initially written for a study of interest rates in cryptocurrency markets. The difficulty of defining a term structure for a currency without a conventional bond market led naturally to a more fundamental question: under what historical conditions does a yield curve become observable at all? Credit existed long before modern money, and interest-bearing loans are documented as early as ancient Mesopotamia. For much of history, the surviving evidence lacks the institutional features that facilitate reliable comparisons of interest rates by maturity: standardised debt instruments, sufficiently homogeneous borrowers, regular issuance over a range of maturities, observable market prices, and liquid secondary markets. We trace the gradual emergence of these conditions from ancient Mesopotamia, Greece, and Rome, through medieval and early modern Europe, to the development of modern sovereign debt markets in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

q-fin.GN